- S.C. hospital worker slapped with $525 federal fine for refilling $0.89 soda
- Teen from ‘Jihad Jane’ plot becomes youngest ever to serve time on U.S. terror charges
- Iranian woman forgives son’s killer at the gallows
- Nebraska principal sorry for ‘don’t tattle’ flier
- Illinois readies to spend $100M for Obama museum in Chicago
- John Edwards back in court — this time as a lawyer for Va. boy’s malpractice case
- Covered California reports more than 200K in overtime Obamacare sign-ups
- Thanks, Chuck: Hagel says U.S. sending Ukraine sleeping mats, helmets
- HUMPRHIES: The Liberal Bully of the Week is …
- Secret Service threatened to kill Mr. Met if he got close to Clinton, mascot claims
George Stephanopoulos, the host of ABC’s “This Week,” found out yesterday just how feisty Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld can be.
“If you had actionable intelligence that Osama bin Laden was in Iran, do you think the United States has the right just to go in and get him without asking for permission?” Mr. Stephanopoulos asked.
Mr. Rumsfeld replied, “Obviously, you wouldn’t get permission.”
“That’s my point,” Mr. Stephanopoulos said.
“And those are questions for the president of the United States,” Mr. Rumsfeld continued.
“What would be your recommendation?” Mr. Stephanopoulos asked.
“I give my recommendations to the president of the United States, not to George Stephanopoulos,” Mr. Rumsfeld said.
“I’ll try. I’ve got to keep trying, Mr. Secretary,” Mr. Stephanopoulos said.
Over time, the fiscal crisis of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid will begin to transform politics, New York Times columnist David Brooks writes.
“The parties will grow less cohesive. The Democrats are held together by the common goal of passing domestic programs that address national needs — like covering the uninsured. But with all the money going to cover entitlements, there will be no way to afford new proposals. Republicans, meanwhile, owe their recent victories to the popularity of tax cuts. But those will be impossible, too. Both parties will lose a core reason for being,” Mr. Brooks said.
“At the same time, Americans will grow even more disenchanted with the political status quo. Not only will there be a general distaste for the hyperpartisan style, but people will also begin to see how partisan brawling threatens the nation’s prosperity. They’ll read more books like ‘The Coming Generational Storm’ by Laurence Kotlikoff and Scott Burns and ‘Running on Empty’ by Peter Peterson. They will be more aware of the looming disaster. As the situation gets worse, the prospects of change get better, because Americans will not slide noiselessly into oblivion.”
Mr. Brooks added: “The party alignments have been pretty stable over the past few generations, but there’s no reason to think they will be in the future. The Whig Party died. The Progressive Movement arose because the parties seemed stagnant a century ago. I wouldn’t be surprised if some anti-politician emerged — of the Schwarzenegger or Perot varieties — to crash through the current alignments and bust heads.”
By John R. Bolton
Reality calls for attaching Gaza to Egypt and the West Bank to Jordan
- Joe Biden's first Instagram pic mocked as shill for sunglass ad
- Jews being told to register in Ukraine: John Kerry
- Removal of military gear limits options for U.S., NATO in Ukraine
- BOLTON: A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- Rand and Ron Paul ride to the rescue for Bundy in Nevada standoff with feds
- CURL: The state of the Union worse than you thought
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Cliven Bundy's Nevada ranch wrecked by retreating feds
- IRS emails reveal discussion with Justice about suing nonprofits for election activities
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.