


SYDNEY, Australia — When Tokyo cast around for candi- dates to replace departing Dutch troops protecting the Japan Self-Defense Forces engaged in reconstruction work in southern Iraq, Australian troops were the ideal choice.
Prime Minister John Howard has been under increasing pressure from the United States and the United Kingdom to match his pro-Bush rhetoric with more ground support. After hostilities officially ended in May 2003, 160 Australian troops remained in Iraq, engaged in noncombat roles.
Observers say Australia’s skimpy postwar contribution embarrasses its military when it deals with UK and U.S. counterparts.
Last year, Foreign Minister Alexander Downer turned down a request from U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan to provide troops to protect the U.N. mission in Iraq.
British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw told Tokyo in January that Britain would cooperate fully to ensure the safety of the 550 Japanese troops in mainly Shi’ite and generally peaceful Al Muthanna province, but he was not clear about which British units would be assigned that task. Japan’s military activities are limited under its postwar constitution.
Howard saw his chance
When Mr. Howard took a Feb. 18 phone call from Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi seeking his assistance, the Australian leader saw an opportunity to please his traditional alliance partners in the West while developing Canberra’s strategic relationship with Tokyo.
In a reversal of his policy of not sending peacekeepers to Iraq after the announced end of the war, Mr. Howard has committed 450 more troops there. Explaining his reasons to Australian reporters, he said Iraq was at “a tilting point.”
“It’s difficult. I know it’s not popular with some people, but it’s the right decision, and in the fullness of time, that will be demonstrated,” he said.
He said Japan’s continued presence in Iraq is vital. “Working alongside and in partnership with a close regional ally and partner such as Japan is very important from Australia’s point of view,” Mr. Howard added.
Canberra has been developing its military relationship with Tokyo since the end of the Cold War, but observers say sending troops to Iraq would provide an opportunity for service-to-service rather than political contacts.
Regional effect noted
“I think in this Asia-Pacific region, the Iraq issue is viewed less through the prism of a war on terror than how it relates to strategic affairs in the region,” said Hugh White, professor of strategic affairs at the Australian National University in Canberra.
Mr. White noted that South Korea has sent 3,600 troops to Iraq, more than Australia and Japan combined. He suggested that this was not out of Seoul’s loyalty to the United States but because it is looking for support on the Korean Peninsula.
Japan is looking to strengthen its own relationship with the United States to gain support in its political dealings with China.
View Entire StoryBy H. Leighton Steward
Fantasy replaces reality in Obama's green economy

By Luke Rosiak - The Washington Times
When Newt Gingrich’s campaign disclosed in October it planned to pay the candidate $70,000 for ...

By David Hill - The Washington Times
The House voted Friday night to approve Gov. Martin O’Malley’s same-sex marriage bill, sending the ...

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times
Acting with striking bipartisanship, Congress on Friday passed a full-year extension of the payroll tax ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.

How does our 50th state view D.C. politics?

Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.