


The District is cracking down on drivers who obscure their license plates from the city’s traffic cameras.
Police officers have begun enforcing a new law that has raised fines from $50 to $500 for using “glass, plastic, or any other type of material or substance (i.e. spray) to cover a license plate.”
The law took effect earlier this month, but police officials could not determine how many fines have been issued under the statute.
The new fine dwarfs the $55 fine for a similar offense in Maryland and the $25 fine for a similar offense in Virginia.
Janis Hazel, spokeswoman for the city’s Department of Motor Vehicles, said police asked for the increased fines to “put some teeth” into restrictions on obstructing license plates.
The new law clarifies an older statute that said license plates “shall be maintained free from foreign materials and in clearly legible condition.”
“Too many people out there are getting objects that obstruct or distort their plates,” said Lt. Byron Hope, head of the police department’s traffic safety office.
Lt. Hope said violation of the new law is a “primary charge,” meaning police officers can stop violators for no other reason than having obscured plates.
The new law is aimed at motorists who apply or install products on their license plates that “obscure [plates] from photo-radar cameras or police being able to adequately see or identify a vehicle,” Miss Hazel said.
While clear or tinted license-plate shields are easy to detect, other products, such as spray-on applications designed to thwart traffic cameras likely still will present problems for police.
Manufacturers of one product, a canned spray called PhotoBlocker, say their product places hyperreflective covers over license plates that make them unreadable when traffic cameras flash.
The spray, marketed by online merchant PhantomPlate (www.phantomplate.com), costs $29.99.
Joe Scott, marketing director for PhantomPlate, said the intent of the product is to “fight unjust traffic tickets.” He said he is not concerned about the new law.
“They are not making it illegal to buy it or sell it,” Mr. Scott said. “It’s good marketing for us. It was hard for us to convince people the product worked, even with all the tests. Why would they make it illegal if it didn’t work?”
Mr. Scott said that the company has sold 30,000 cans of PhotoBlocker and that he has never heard a complaint that police detected the spray applied to a license plate.
View Entire StoryBy H. Leighton Steward
Fantasy replaces reality in Obama's green economy

By Luke Rosiak - The Washington Times
When Newt Gingrich’s campaign disclosed in October it planned to pay the candidate $70,000 for ...

By David Hill - The Washington Times
The House voted Friday night to approve Gov. Martin O’Malley’s same-sex marriage bill, sending the ...

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times
Acting with striking bipartisanship, Congress on Friday passed a full-year extension of the payroll tax ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.

How does our 50th state view D.C. politics?

Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.