The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    HUTCHISON: Right must understand barriers to success

  • National

    WILLIAMS: Legislative malpractice practiced

  • Sports

    Redskins the ugliest show on Earth

  • Politics

    Obama: 'No faith justifies' Fort Hood rampage

  • National

    Michigan farm expert opens Marijuana U.

  • Politics

    Obama looks to avoid pitfalls in Asia

  • Politics

    Kennedy's disability plan could snag health bill

Saturday, May 7, 2005

Fatally 'progressive' plan

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Stories

  • U.S. soldier's body found in Afghan river
  • Obama: 'No faith justifies' Fort Hood rampage
  • Lights return following Brazilian blackout
  • Cashing in big on viral videos

By

Despite President Bush's promise not to negotiate with himself on Social Security, he keeps tossing out ideas meant to placate Democrats that have the opposite effect.

In his April 28 press conference, he said, "I propose a Social Security system in the future where benefits for low-income workers will grow faster than benefits for people who are better off. By providing more generous benefits for low-income retirees, we'll make this commitment: If you work hard and pay into Social Security your entire life, you will not retire into poverty."

The idea came from Democrat Bob Pozen, an attorney and mutual fund executive. For workers with average "career" earnings below $25,000 by 2012, "progressive indexing" would continue adjusting first-year benefits upward to keep pace with wages, with price indexing after the first year as we do now.

Those with average career earnings above $113,000 would have initial benefits adjusted for inflation alone -- about 1 percent a year slower than with wage indexing. That is what the president had previously proposed for everyone -- and with fewer complaints from Democrats.

When the president embraced the notion of benefits growing least rapidly for high-income workers, the idea received the harshest criticism from egalitarian Democrats.

New York Times columnist Paul Krugman called it a vicious "attempt to turn Social Security into nothing but a program for the poor." Kerry adviser Jason Furman called Mr. Pozen's plan "a system... in which upper-income people would have less of a stake in traditional Social Security, potentially undermining political support for it."

Mr. Pozen finds this hypocritical, since his fellow Democrats have been eager to raise the salary subject to payroll tax from $90,000 to a much higher figure. Do they imagine Congress could slap an extra 12.4 percent tax on upper-income people without making them feel they had "less of a stake in traditional Social Security"?

Even without the Pozen plan, the Social Security benefit formula is already rigged so those who paid into the system for the fewest years receive a much better deal that those who paid "their entire lives." Those who paid payroll taxes for decades are also more likely to have saved for retirement or to keep working past age 65 -- either of which means 50 percent to 85 percent of their benefits will be taxed.

Even if Social Security remains an unreformed time bomb for a while, fewer and fewer people will feel they have a fair stake in it in the near future.

All proposed solutions we've seen so far from Democrats would further undermine popular support for Social Security by tilting today's heavily means-tested Social Security system even more severely against those who pay the most in payroll taxes.

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Warner: Obama misplayed health care debate
  3. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  4. PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil
  5. Families meet as sniper's execution nears
More Top Stories »
  1. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
  2. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies
  3. Court refuses to halt sniper's execution
  4. High court refuses to halt sniper execution
  5. Parents buying homes for kids at college

Most Shared

  1. PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil
  2. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  3. Michigan farm expert opens Marijuana U.
  4. Defense nominee won't reveal potential conflicts
  5. 'Fuzzy math' could drive health bill cost higher
More Top Stories »
  1. The siren call of Shariah
  2. End of America's moment
  3. EXCLUSIVE: Warner: Obama misplayed health care debate
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  5. Sinking dollar fuels new gold rush

Most Commented

  1. PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil
  2. 'Fuzzy math' could drive health bill cost higher
  3. Defense nominee won't reveal potential conflicts
  4. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  5. Jihadists in the military
More Top Stories »
  1. Hood suspect earlier came under FBI scrutiny
  2. 'Anti-vaccine' attitude hampers H1N1 effort
  3. Lieberman vows probe of Hood rampage
  4. The siren call of Shariah
  5. Leadership changes at The Times

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    New Vatican constitution released

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    Hall, Portis on radio

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.