- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
FDA sets guides for condom labels
The federal government wants condom labels to specify the kinds of sexually transmitted infections they can and cannot protect against.
An HIV/AIDS advocacy group reacted positively to the Food and Drug Administration’s proposal. However, Sen. Tom Coburn, who wrote the law asking for new condom labels, said the agency was still offering “inconclusive assurances” about the products.
Currently, condom labels say they are generally effective in reducing the risks for pregnancy or sexually transmitted diseases (STD), particularly HIV/AIDS. Their most urgent warning is that latex can cause allergic reactions.
Under the FDA’s proposed language, packaging would say that condoms provide “less protection” from herpes and human papillomavirus (HPV) because those STDs are spread via skin contact “outside the area covered by the condom.”
Still, “[u]sing latex condoms every time you have sex may still give you some benefits against these STDs,” the FDA language said, urging consumers to bring any questions to health care workers or public health agencies.
The FDA further wants condom labels to say that nonoxynol-9 (N-9), a spermicidal lubricant, should not be used by people at risk of catching HIV. Studies show that N-9 can irritate vaginal or rectal skin and increase the likelihood of HIV transmission.
Mr. Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican and a physician, applauded the FDA’s language on N-9 but said the agency “continues to promote inconclusive assurances” about condoms, especially their effectiveness against HPV, which causes cervical cancer.
The FDA language “claims condoms ‘may’ provide protection against cervical cancer,” said Mr. Coburn, author of the 2000 legislation requiring updated condom labels.
“This is speculation rather than scientific fact and is misleading,” he said, adding that with 20,000 cervical cancer deaths in the past five years, women deserve more accurate information.
Julie Davids, executive director of the Community HIV/AIDS Mobilization Project, commended the FDA “for sticking to sound public health rather than scare tactics.”
“I would hope that the clarifying language marks the start of a real commitment to educating the American public about the importance of condom use and public health programs to help people use them correctly and consistently,” she said.
The new guidance applies to latex condoms, which make up about 98 percent of the market; rules for other condoms are forthcoming.
Condom makers are not required to use exact FDA language, but they have to include the information in some form on their packages.
The FDA rules are scheduled to appear next week in the Federal Register. A 90-day public comment period follows.
This article is based in part on wire service reports.
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- House votes for bargain to end budget drama
- Jane Fonda Foundation fails to make single contribution in 5 years: report
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Atheists smug as Hindus join Satanists to demand display at Oklahoma Statehouse
- American bourbon now better than Scottish whisky: U.K.-born expert
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Consummate traveler Todd DeFeo explores the unique stories that make destinations worth going to.
Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow