U.S. dominance in Internet regulation under fire

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

A growing bloc of rich and poor nations wants to strip the U.S. government of its role managing the Internet's most basic infrastructure and hand it over to a still-undefined international coalition.

The Bush administration opposes such a move, saying a bureaucratic morass would undermine the stability and reliability of the Internet.

"What we are not interested in ... is the establishment of a new international institution to regulate the Internet," said David Gross, head of the U.S. delegation to the World Summit on the Information Society, U.N.-brokered meetings to deal with issues related to cybercrime, economic development and Internet management.

Under such a proposal, the U.S. would have to agree to give up control, an unlikely result.

The dispute threatens progress on issues such as international cooperation on reducing junk e-mail and expanding the Internet to poor countries.

Countries are fighting over control of the Internet's Domain Name Systems. DNS translates domain names, such as www.google.com, into the unique numerical addresses read by computers. Allocation and coordination of the names and numbers from a central authority is crucial to linking the multiple, scattered networks that constitute the Internet.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is a nonprofit in Marina del Rey, Calif., that has a memorandum of understanding with the Commerce Department to oversee the naming system and allocate top-level domains such as ".com," ".ca" for Canada and the new ".mobi" for mobile phones. ICANN has no say over Internet content.

Countries outside the U.S., often with different objectives, chafe at the central U.S. role.

Argentina, for example, sees the Internet as a global resource and thinks all nations, through a multilateral institution, should have a role in setting policies. A few authoritarian regimes, such as Cuba and Iran, are more interested in limiting access to information.

The movement for greater international involvement gathered steam at the end of last month when the European Union made a call to end the Commerce Department role.