The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story

New ballpark should aim for 'potty parity'

By

Originally published 10:28 p.m., October 19, 2005, updated 12:00 a.m., October 20, 2005

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Washington baseball fans expect the District's proposed new major league stadium to have it all -- luxury boxes, great seats, outfield views of the monuments -- and ladies' restrooms. Lots and lots of ladies' restrooms.

The District needs to ensure that its proposed stadium meets evolving standards for "potty parity," said John Banzhaf, professor of public interest law at George Washington University and one of the nation's authorities on legal battles over access to public restrooms.

Mr. Banzhaf sent a letter yesterday to D.C. Council members, warning that current stadium plans have too few restrooms for women and could result in sex-discrimination lawsuits if women have to wait in significantly longer lines than men. Such waits could be in violation of federal and D.C. law.

"A growing number of courts have now recognized that this may constitute illegal sex discrimination, and in part, our D.C. Human Rights Act provided that anything that has the 'effect or consequence' of [disadvantaging] one gender over the other is illegal whether or not the result is intended," Mr. Banzhaf said.

He said the stadium's preliminary blueprints tout one toilet for every 75 women, and one toilet for every 350 men and one urinal for every 100 men, according to a Washington City Paper report quoting ballpark architect Joseph Spear.

Those plans, Mr. Banzhaf said, will cause "some pretty huge backups."

Tony Robinson, spokesman for the D.C. Sports and Entertainment Commission, said Mr. Banzhaf is "uninformed."

"We have every confidence that the stadium is going to be built in accordance to every [American Disabilities Act] guideline that applies to the new ballpark," he said. "We don't even know the total number of restrooms that will be in the stadium, so where he's getting his information from we're not sure."

Mr. Robinson said the designs of HOK Sport, the architectural firm behind 21 of the most recent major league stadiums, are beyond code.

"So we don't think we're doing anything discriminatory. As a matter of fact, we're sure we aren't," he said.

This isn't the first time Mr. Banzhaf has caused a stir.

Dubbed the "father of potty parity" for filing several court complaints -- including the first one on the federal level -- Mr. Banzhaf has successfully brought similar lawsuits against dry cleaners and hair salons in the District that charged women more for the same services provided to men. He has also filed suits against tobacco companies and an obesity suit against McDonald's, among others.

Potty parity laws -- adopted by about a dozen jurisdictions across the country, including New York City -- require twice as many restroom facilities for women as men in stadiums, theaters and other venues. The laws were adopted because studies have shown that women tend to spend twice as much time in restrooms as men.

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments
Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Senate delays climate bill until September
  2. Inside the Ring
  3. Iranians resume protesting election result
  4. GOP hits Obama using his own words
  5. WH communications director leaving
  6. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  7. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  8. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  9. NRA raises concerns over Sotomayor
  10. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. Israeli know-how
  5. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  6. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  7. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  8. YON: Girl with no future
  9. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips
  10. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Related Stories

A heavy burden

Fast food and fat lawsuits

Soda jerk

Fast food next on the menu for lawyers

A truly deadly sin

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.