


President Bush, accused of embarking on a discretionary spending spree to rebuild the Gulf Coast, yesterday said the federal government is required by law to shoulder most of the cost.
“We have a responsibility by law to help rebuild the infrastructure,” Mr. Bush said on his fifth visit to the Gulf Coast since Hurricane Katrina struck three weeks ago. He said the federal government is “the principal party responsible for rebuilding infrastructure.”
White House officials pointed out that the 1988 Stafford Act, which is triggered by disasters such as Katrina, requires that the federal government pay at least 75 percent of the cost of rebuilding public infrastructure.
The federal government’s share can jump to more than 90 percent in certain extraordinary circumstances, such as Hurricane Andrew in 1992, the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995 and the September 11 attacks.
Yet the Associated Press suggested Friday that White House plans to rebuild the Gulf Coast are discretionary.
“President Bush is presiding over the most expensive government relief and reconstruc tion operation in U.S. history, casting aside budget discipline,” wrote reporter Tom Raum in a story headlined “The new New Deal?”
The next day, conservative John Podhoretz expressed alarm about the president’s post-Katrina spending plans in a New York Post column.
“In ignoring the small-government sensitivities of conservatives,” he wrote, “Bush may have done something politically catastrophic to his own presidency.”
White House spokesman Trent Duffy countered that Mr. Bush has no choice.
“I guess you could make a discretionary decision not to rebuild this part of the United States, but it would be totally counterproductive,” he said. “I mean, it’s critical to the economy.”
He pointed out that most of the money will be spent on indispensable items such as military and transportation facilities.
“A lot of the big-ticket items are roads — those are a national asset,” he added. “I mean, the farmers in Ohio use the roads in Louisiana and use the navigable waterways of the Mississippi River to ship their agriculture exports to the rest of the world.
“The other big-ticket items are military bases and Veterans Affairs hospitals,” he added. “Does any self-described conservative want to not rebuild our military bases or VA hospitals?”
Still, such conservatives as OpinionJournal.com assistant editor Brendan Miniter are urging the White House to exercise restraint.
“Katrina is swamping every goal conservatives have, from limiting government to cutting taxes to reforming entitlement programs,” he wrote yesterday on the site, published by the Wall Street Journal. “Katrina spending has already imperiled plans to repeal the death tax.”
View Entire StoryBy H. Leighton Steward
Fantasy replaces reality in Obama's green economy

By Luke Rosiak - The Washington Times
When Newt Gingrich’s campaign disclosed in October it planned to pay the candidate $70,000 for ...

By David Hill - The Washington Times
The House voted Friday night to approve Gov. Martin O’Malley’s same-sex marriage bill, sending the ...

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times
Acting with striking bipartisanship, Congress on Friday passed a full-year extension of the payroll tax ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.

How does our 50th state view D.C. politics?

Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.