


Scientists yesterday reported that they have devised a way to create human embryonic stem cells that does not harm embryos.
Researchers with Advanced Cell Technology, a California-based biotechnology firm that has been on the cutting edge of experimentation with cloning and stem cells, disclosed their latest findings online in the journal Nature.
They say their technique offers a potential solution to the political and moral debate over using embryonic stem cells to treat life-threatening diseases because embryos have to be destroyed.
The company says its technique takes just a single cell, or blastomere, from a two-day-old embryo, after the fertilized egg has divided into eight cells. They use the blastomere to seed a line of stem cells, which can then grow into any kind of human tissue.
The rest of the embryo retains the capability to grow into a healthy human, according to the biotech firm, which operates in Alameda, Calif., and Worcester, Mass.
The current procedure requires the destruction of embryos, consisting of 100 to 150 cells, after about five days of development. Harvesting the cells kills the embryo.
“We have demonstrated, for the first time, that human embryonic stem cells can be generated without interfering with the embryo’s potential for life,” said Dr. Robert Lanza, vice president of research and scientific development at the company and the study’s senior author.
But few in the scientific, bioethics or pro-life community think the new technique will end the debate.
“It’s scientifically interesting … but it’s not going to settle the debate. If one believes an embryo should be accorded the rights of protection of a person, why is it more [morally acceptable] to extract one cell from an embryo than to extract many cells?” said B.D. Colen, spokesman for Harvard University’s Stem Cell Institute.
Cell extraction was criticized on moral grounds by Richard M. Doerflinger, deputy director of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities.
“It is widely believed that one cell of a very early embryo may separate and become a new embryo, an identical twin,” he said yesterday.
The company’s research produced two viable stem-cell lines from 16 embryos.
“The experiment itself is gravely unethical, because it involved thawing and manipulating 16 human embryos and then discarding them,” Mr. Doerflinger said. “By picking single cells from eight-celled embryos and culturing them overnight, it is possible the researchers created and destroyed as many as 91 additional very early embryos to get two new cell lines.”
But Dr. Lanza, in a telephone interview, said such criticisms show “scientific ignorance.”
In the report in Nature, he said individual blastomeres in embryos that have only eight to 16 cells “have never been shown to have intrinsic capacity to generate a complete organism in any mammalian species.”
View Entire StoryBy Julia A. Seymour
Planned Parenthood flap preceded by assault from anti-chemical activists

By Susan Crabtree - The Washington Times
updated 33 minutes ago
Six members of the House Ethics Committee including its chairman have recused themselves from any ...

By Guy Taylor - The Washington Times
U.S. and European leaders expressed optimism Friday that direct talks with Iran about its nuclear ...

By Ashish Kumar Sen - The Washington Times
Four hundred Iranian dissidents on Friday started relocating from Camp Ashraf, north of Baghdad, to ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.

The Red Thread is written for that special tribe: adoptive families and those who hope to be.

We’re human: we don’t always think things through, so we accept many ideas that are, well, ideas that are wrong. We also look past certain truths without recognizing them.