You are currently viewing the printable version of this article, to return to the normal page, please click here.
The Washington Times Online Edition

Vice presidential possibilities

Question of the Day

Who do you think, among the GOP presidential candidates, will raise the most funds?

View results

Do you need to know who a party's presidential nominee will be before you can say anything about who its nominee for vice president will be? Yes and no. That's because far from being an expression of personal choice on the part of the nominee, the considerations involved in selecting a veep tend not to change over time.

In general, there are four main criteria, often overlapping: someone who unites the party's disparate factions behind the ticket; someone who brings balance to the ticket, typically but not necessarily regional balance; someone who offers an immediate electoral payoff in terms of an increased chance of victory in a swing state or special appeal to a broad-based bloc of voters; someone who will be seen as a plausible successor, not so much in the sense of ascending to the Oval Office because of a premature vacancy but in terms of the ability to use the vice presidency to prepare a run for the presidency.

We looked at the early Democratic returns last week. What about the Republican?

The essential fact of the campaign so far is that the two Republicans polling best at present are both outliers with respect to the party's activist, conservative base. They are John McCain and Rudy Giuliani. Mr. McCain is a maverick with a long record as a thorn in the side of those who consider themselves "movement" conservatives on issues ranging from campaign finance reform to immigration. During his 2000 bid to derail George W. Bush's nomination, he also made comments that antagonized evangelical Christians. Mr. Giuliani, for his part, is pro-choice, which is perhaps enough said given the importance of the pro-life position in the Republican Party.

Does that mean the party base will be unwilling to line up behind either of the two? Not necessarily. Here, the veepstakes may be crucial.

Neither of the two would make a good running mate for the other. Rather, in either case, the nominee will likely be looking to someone who has attracted the affection and loyalty of the Republican Party's conservative base. Moreover, it will not be enough to bring in some gray-beard whose job is liaison and reassurance: The real point will be someone whom conservatives regard as a plausible future presidential candidate. So in the GOP this time around, it looks like unity and succession stand as higher priorities than ticket balance and short-term electoral payoff, at least if either of the two top contenders comes in.

Who might fill the bill? One of the most intriguing possibilities at this point is that Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas will get into the race, in effect running for vice president. He's got the conservative bona fides and an activist streak on such issues as halting genocide in Darfur and human rights more broadly. If conservatives demonstrate support and enthusiasm for him during the primaries, he might well be the one.

Another interesting possibility is Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. He, too, has shown early appeal among conservatives. In his case, however, there is a major roadblock en route to the top of the GOP ticket, namely, the question of whether Americans are ready for a Mormon to be president. Because the country as a whole is a lot more sensitive on these issues than it used to be, the reservation will be expressed as I just put it, namely, not about Mr. Romney's religion but about what people think about Mr. Romney's religion.

But that, in turn, provides an opportunity: With Mr. Romney in the No. 2 slot, the "Mormon issue," such as it is, would play itself out nationally but without the stress of the top slot aggravating the question. It is especially true of Mr. Romney that he would be more plausible as a presidential candidate with a national run for veep behind him.

Then we get to the more exotic possibilities: OK, so Jeb Bush has ruled out running for president in 2008. That's for the sole reason that his brother is president; otherwise he'd be a top contender. But does that mean he would refuse the No. 2 slot on the ticket if offered? He's not only a party uniter and a potential president himself, he's a huge asset in Florida. And oddly enough, running for vice president could seem not so much an exercise in dynastic politics as humility: no entitlement to step in at the top.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice as veep offers history-making possibilities. She's never run for elected office, and that's ordinarily a must, but she is no ordinary figure. What would happen with the African American vote in this scenario?

Suppose, though, our Republican nominee is such a maverick that he decides to throw out all the usual criteria in favor of a choice both unprecedented and spectacular. Let me put the possibility in the form of an answer on "Jeopardy!", circa 2106, a hundred years from now.

"The Vice Presidency" for $2,000: The only candidate to run for vice president on the ticket of both major political parties.

Bzzz. Who is Joe Lieberman?

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • In this July 13, 2010 photo, Greg Casady of Council Bluffs, Iowa, holds a sign in favor of recent legislation in Arizona while demonstrating in support of recent legislation dealing with illegal immigration at the Fremont, Neb. Municipal Building. A federal judge on Monday, Feb. 20, 2012 rejected a portion of the city of Fremont's ordinance that would have denied housing permits to illegal immigrants, but upheld a requirement that employers verify the citizenship status of people they hire. (AP Photo/The Omaha World-Herald, Mark Davis)

    Hopefuls mix words, deeds on E-Verify

    By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

  • Antonya Huntenburg, 21, of Hillsborough, N.J., a student at the Corcoran College of Art and Design, says everyone she knows is under some kind of economic pressure, including her parents. She says she joined the Occupy D.C. encampment on McPherson Square "to be safe." (Rod Lamkey Jr./The Washington Times)

    Youths show economic frustration in streets around the world

    By Patrice Hill - The Washington Times

  • **FILE** Chief Warrant Officer Charlie Morgan attends the OutServe Armed Forces Leadership Summit on Oct. 15, 2011, in Las Vegas. (Associated Press)

    Military gay group growing, aiming for more rights

    By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Politics and Pride

          Advocating for the Republican Party to be on the right side of history supporting liberty for all.

          Omkara World

          Empowering mind/body/spirit and health dialogue along with cutting-edge, conscious social, political, and world commentary with Adam Omkara. Join the Evolution!