

Sen. Barack Obama yesterday joined a chorus of potential Democratic presidential candidates criticizing U.S. policy in Iraq, telling supporters he opposes sending more troops and urging them to send letters to persuade President Bush to change the course of the war.
Democrats considering White House bids have spent the past several weeks outlining, clarifying and strengthening their positions on Iraq as Mr. Bush weighs his options.
The president, who met yesterday with key advisers, plans to announce a new strategy for the war early next month. He is thought to favor sending 20,000 to 40,000 additional troops to Baghdad, an idea several Democratic White House prospects have criticized.
In an e-mail titled “Escalation is not the answer,” Mr. Obama yesterday asked voters to tell Mr. Bush “our soldiers are not numbers to add just because someone couldn’t think of a better idea.”
The Illinois Democrat’s message includes a link to the White House’s “contact” page.
“They are our sons and daughters, our brothers and sisters, our neighbors and friends who are willing to wave goodbye to everything they’ve ever known just for the chance to serve their country,” Mr. Obama said of the troops. “Our men and women in uniform are doing a terrific job under extremely difficult conditions. But our government has failed them so many times over the last few years, and we simply cannot afford to do it again. We must not multiply the mistakes of yesterday, we must end them today.”
He repeated his call to begin a phased troop withdrawal and send a signal “that ours is not an open-ended commitment.”
It is a message more hopefuls and potential candidates are echoing as the 2008 election nears.
“Iraq is a question that dominates the political focus of both parties,” said Rep. Duncan Hunter of California, who will seek the Republican presidential nomination.
Mr. Obama, who used the term “quagmire” to describe Iraq, reminds supporters that he has spoken against the war since 2002.
It’s a subtle dig at likely Democratic candidate Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, who each voted for the war but now oppose it.
Mr. Edwards, the 2004 vice presidential nominee, announced yesterday that he is making another bid for the presidency.
Last year, Mr. Edwards said in an editorial that voting for the war in October 2002 was a mistake. He wants to withdraw 40,000 troops immediately.
“What we need to do is make it clear that we’re not going to stay there forever as an occupying force,” he said on CNN’s “American Morning.”
Mrs. Clinton said last week on NBC’s “Today” show that she cannot support increasing troop levels unless it is part of a larger plan to end the violence in Iraq.
View Entire StoryPresident is violating religious freedom for an ineffective plan

By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times
Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, under fire from Congress and veterans for naming ships after fellow ...

By Tim Devaney - The Washington Times
Rick Berman has a black baseball cap with the words “Dr. Evil” in his K ...

By Sean Lengell and Dave Boyer - The Washington Times
Congressional leaders told their lawmakers Tuesday night they’ve reached a tentative deal to extend the ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

Immerse yourselves in the genius insights of a high school sports freak and statistical wizard who knows it all. Or at least thinks he does.

Health care reform, organized medicine, physician practice management, and patient care--a real time look at the challenges facing doctors and patients in America today.