- The Washington Times - Saturday, December 9, 2006

“Howie Rich from New York City” has become the left’s latest whipping boy. The wealthy Gotham real estate investor and long-time free market activist has generated liberal ire through his personal donations and support of Americans for Limited Government, U.S. Term Limits and other groups that sponsor state ballot measures to curb eminent domain abuse, cap state spending and curtail careerism among elected officials.

“Who is Howie Rich from New York City?” asked the online newsletter of SEIU Local 503, a union based in Salem, Ore. “And why is he spending millions to push dangerous policy gimmicks in numerous states thousands of miles from his front door?”

“As governor,” Oregon Democrat Ted Kulongoski wrote Mr. Rich, “I feel it is my obligation to stand up to the special interest groups you fund and protect the most vulnerable in our population — kids and seniors — who depend on services you are proposing to cut.” AFL-CIO News called Mr. Richs’ pro-market, small-government groups a “tangled extremist Web.” HowieRichExposed.com dubbed him “the financial muscle behind the drive to mislead voters in many states into degrading state government services.”

All this makes Howie howl.

“I don’t think anybody has anything to fear from my involvement in the initiative process or anything else,” he laughs. “I have been fortunate enough to have been successful in business, and I want to do something in this life to advance liberty.” He also notes his Big Labor critics use compulsory union dues to thwart his efforts. “Every nickel that I either donate or raise is voluntary,” Mr. Rich tells me. “Nobody was coerced into giving.”

Mr. Rich nibbles on a piece of raw yellow tail at Sushi Yasuda restaurant near the United Nations. The Parliament of Man’s monolithic tower looms at the end of Manhattan’s East 43rd Street, just steps away. He rarely grants interviews, preferring to campaign quietly.

“All I have done here, for the most part, is provide seed money. All of these initiatives are left up to the voters. That’s what these people who consider money evil are not willing to address. It’s the voters in these states who ultimately make the decisions,” he said.

Mr. Rich, whose surname mirrors his bank account, is worth unspecified millions. He poured his initial plumbing-contracting revenues into real estate ventures that have grown handsomely. For November’s election, Mr. Rich and groups he runs or advises reportedly spent $15 million promoting state initiatives. While all three of Mr. Rich’s budget-trimming Taxpayer Bill of Rights, or TABOR, proposals failed, nine of 12 eminent-domain-relief questions passed overwhelmingly.

In Louisiana, for instance, 55 percent of voters approved a measure that prohibits cities from condemning private property for projects designed to create jobs or boost tax revenues. In Florida, 69 percent of voters adopted property protections, as did 80 percent of Michigan voters. In South Carolina, 86 percent of voters banned condemnations for “the purpose or benefit of economic development, unless the condemnation is for public use.”

Like the numerous property tax cuts that voters endorsed after Californians enacted Proposition 13 in 1978, these eminent-domain initiatives quietly swept the nation even as Republicans had a rotten night. Americans recoiled against the U.S. Supreme Court’s Kelo v. New London decision that freed cities to use eminent domain to snatch private property, not for public, but for private purposes.

Some of Mr. Rich’s foes claim he is shielding his portfolio from sticky-fingered local bureaucrats. “It’s a crock,” he replies. “I own no real estate in any of the 12 states where we had property rights initiatives on the ballot.”

Atop these political activities, which he plans to conduct in more states in 2008, Mr. Rich remains a trustee of the libertarian Cato Institute and the Club for Growth. His wife, Andrea, former owner of Laissez-Faire Books, is a trustee of the free-market Atlas Economic Research Foundation (with which I am a senior fellow).

“What we do is designed to advance individual freedom and create an atmosphere where we restore the Founders’ concepts of property rights and free markets,” says Mr. Rich, a not-so-tall bald man fond of patterned sport jackets.

He taunts his critics. “People think you can come in, win a few, and go away,” Mr. Rich says. “You’re in the ring. You’ve got to keep punching.”

Deroy Murdock is a columnist with the Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with Stanford University’s Hoover Institution.

LOAD COMMENTS ()

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide