- Beretta leaves Maryland over gun laws, heads for Tennessee
- Neal Boortz defends Hillary Clinton for representing child rapist
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Top federal judge uses pizza to explain complex Obamacare situation
- Obama, Biden overhaul job training programs
- Drought-plagued Californians turn to paint to keep lawns green
- ISIL now forcing Iraqi shopkeepers to veil mannequins in Mosul
- 11 parents of Nigeria’s abducted girls die
- Genetic mapping triggers new hope on schizophrenia
- Turkish P.M. Erdogan won’t speak to Obama, but he’ll take calls from Biden
Braves strike out in Richmond
Question of the Day
The United Methodist Church has rejected Richmond for its 2012 international conference because the city’s minor league baseball team is named the Braves.
“Many Native Americans, if you ask them what they think about team mascots, will tell you that they find [them] to be demeaning,” said Stephen Drachler, a spokesman for the United Methodist Church.
Apparently, nobody asked Virginia’s Monacan Nation, located near Lynchburg about 130 miles west of Richmond.
Kenneth Branham, Monacan chief, yesterday said, “The mascot thing has been blown out of proportion.”
The problem is not that teams have American Indian names and mascots, but how those mascots act, Mr. Branham said.
“It is not so much the name as the silly way they act,” he said. “When children see that, they think that is how Indians act.”
The Richmond Braves don’t have a mascot. They have a duck — “a big, happy, yellow” one named “Diamond Duck,” Braves spokesman John Emmett said.
What’s more, the mascot for the Atlanta Braves — the Major League parent team of the Richmond Braves — is a large, talking baseball named “Homer.”
A United Methodist Church panel last week announced that holding the General Conference in Richmond would violate a 2004 resolution barring Methodist events in cities where professional sports teams use American Indian names or symbols.
When the panel met last fall to select a site for the 2012 conclave, it automatically ruled out Atlanta, because of its Braves, and Washington, D.C., because of its Redskins.
But Richmond — which is within the Virginia Conference, the church’s largest U.S. region — made the initial cut because the panel did not consider minor league teams during the selection process. A pastor from New York informed the panel of the Braves’ existence.
“However well-intended, sports teams named after Native Americans demean the heritage of native people,” says Gail Murphy-Geiss of Centennial, Colo., who headed the selection panel. “They perpetuate unhealthy and unfair stereotypes.”
“[The Braves’ name] does offend some people, but not me personally,” said Ken Adams, chief of the Upper Mattaponi Indian tribe in King William County, about 25 miles from Richmond. “It is a name I grew up with.”
Mr. Branham said he appreciates the efforts of the Methodists, though he was unaware of their actions regarding Richmond. Mascots are an important issue to some tribes in other states, he said.
“Here in Virginia, the eight tribes have more important issues than whining about mascots,” he said.
The president could pay the full price for ignoring Congress
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- D.C. appeals panel deals big blow to Obamacare subsidies
- Beretta moving to Tennessee over Maryland gun laws
- Gen. James Amos, Marine Corps commandant, slams Obama's handling of Iraq
- 'Straight White Guy Festival' supposedly set for Ohio park
- LYONS: Small-arms treaty, big Second Amendment threat
- Pentagon team dispatched to Ukraine amid crisis with Russia
- Obama family set to buy $4.25M desert home in California: report
- PRUDEN: A deadly enemy within exacerbating immigration crisis
- DEACE: How to go from civil rights icon to bigot in one quote
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq