Vietnam peace milestone

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

Friday marked the 33rd anniversary of the signing of the Vietnam Peace Accords, the agreement that was supposed to bring "peace with honor" and end the conflict in Southeast Asia that bitterly divided Americans.

Some of the current vitriol in U.S. politics dates back that far, a poison that still seems to frustrate any effort toward civility and bipartisanship on almost anything.

Fittingly, the ceremonies in Paris were marked by an eerie silence, with no word or gesture to reflect relief that years of war were coming to an end.

Actually, there were two sessions. In the morning, officials from the United States, North Vietnam, South Vietnam and the Viet Cong signed the documents. In the afternoon, only the United States and North Vietnam took part.

The accords were ambiguous, a result of compromises that permitted all the Vietnamese delegations to give their own contradictory meanings and still allow the U.S. to claim victory.

Almost from the start, doubts were cast on whether the accords would establish any sort of lasting peace -- doubts that proved well founded.

By the end of the next month, however, the last U.S. combat troops had left Vietnam. As far as Washington was concerned, the United States had achieved its goals.

Had Richard Nixon remained president and not come to grief in the Watergate mess, the peace might have held. Many overseas considered him unpredictable. Fear of what he might do could have deterred the North Vietnamese from breaking the agreements and resuming their invasion of the South.

But two years after the last U.S. combat units had gone home, Hanoi launched the first phase of a new offensive. In seven weeks, the South Vietnamese army had collapsed and the North's forces held the central highlands and the east coast.

Then the North paused -- partly to regroup for the final drive on Saigon but also to see if the United States would act. The United States was not willing to re-enter the battle.