Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Vietnam peace milestone

Friday marked the 33rd anniversary of the signing of the Vietnam Peace Accords, the agreement that was supposed to bring “peace with honor” and end the conflict in Southeast Asia that bitterly divided Americans.

Some of the current vitriol in U.S. politics dates back that far, a poison that still seems to frustrate any effort toward civility and bipartisanship on almost anything.

Fittingly, the ceremonies in Paris were marked by an eerie silence, with no word or gesture to reflect relief that years of war were coming to an end.

Actually, there were two sessions. In the morning, officials from the United States, North Vietnam, South Vietnam and the Viet Cong signed the documents. In the afternoon, only the United States and North Vietnam took part.

The accords were ambiguous, a result of compromises that permitted all the Vietnamese delegations to give their own contradictory meanings and still allow the U.S. to claim victory.

Almost from the start, doubts were cast on whether the accords would establish any sort of lasting peace — doubts that proved well founded.

By the end of the next month, however, the last U.S. combat troops had left Vietnam. As far as Washington was concerned, the United States had achieved its goals.

Had Richard Nixon remained president and not come to grief in the Watergate mess, the peace might have held. Many overseas considered him unpredictable. Fear of what he might do could have deterred the North Vietnamese from breaking the agreements and resuming their invasion of the South.

But two years after the last U.S. combat units had gone home, Hanoi launched the first phase of a new offensive. In seven weeks, the South Vietnamese army had collapsed and the North’s forces held the central highlands and the east coast.

Then the North paused — partly to regroup for the final drive on Saigon but also to see if the United States would act. The United States was not willing to re-enter the battle.

So the offensive went on, and on April 29 the United States ordered the helicopter evacuation of the U.S. Embassy in Saigon and as many South Vietnamese as possible, a total of 7,000. At its overstaffed embassy, the United States had a handful of diplomats, a beefed-up Marine guard and a bevy of CIA agents.

The United States considers Jan. 1, 1961, as the war’s starting date and counts casualties from then.

So, the official price — in human terms — of more than a decade of war was 58,226 American military deaths.

For the Vietnamese, the toll was even higher — much higher. In April 1995, Vietnam said a total of a million Vietnamese combatants and 4 million civilians had been killed in the conflict. These figures have been generally accepted.

One lingering controversy from the war has been the fate of the 2,300 Americans listed as “Missing in Action.” There have been charges that some of these have actually been held as prisoners. The Vietnamese deny this.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • ** FILE ** Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich speaks during a news conference on Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

    Questions surface on Gingrich campaign travel payments

    By Luke Rosiak - The Washington Times

  • This artist rendering shows Amine El Khalifi before U.S. District Judge T. Rawles Jones Jr. in federal court in Alexandria, Va., Friday, Feb. 17, 2012. El Khalifi, a 29-year-old Moroccan man was arrested Friday near the U.S. Capitol as he was planning to detonate what he thought was a suicide vest, given to him by FBI undercover operatives, said police and government officials. (AP Photo/Dana Verkouteren)

    Terror suspect arrested near U.S. Capitol

    By Tom Howell Jr. - The Washington Times

  • Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Associated Press)

    Justice says Supreme Court should revisit campaign finance

    By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Forbidden Table Talk

          Political satirist and Christian apologist Bob Siegel discusses religion and politics.

          The Political Pro-Con

          Not your typical discussion, writer Conor Murphy writes about the cons, and pros, of politics

          A Heart Without Compromise; Advocating for Children

          Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.