- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
- In Colorado, a pot holiday tries to go mainstream
- Ukraine PM vows to find ‘bastards’ behind anti-Semitic fliers
- Pope Francis, huge crowd joyously celebrate Easter
- Transcript reveals confusion over ferry evacuation in South Korea
- Militants kill 14 Algerian soldiers in ambush
- Unbeliebable: White House turns Bieber petition response into immigration screed
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador’s visa, but says law is ‘advisory’
- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
Democrats likely to filibuster nominee
Senate Democrats said yesterday that they are considering a filibuster of President Bush’s latest nominee to the federal appeals court.
“We’ll do whatever is necessary to protect the judiciary,” Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid told reporters yesterday when asked whether Democrats would block the nomination of William J. Haynes II to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, based in Richmond.
A filibuster would set up the first test of Majority Leader Bill Frist’s promise to employ the “nuclear option” to stop Democrats’ efforts to block judicial nominations.
The situation could become more dramatic because at least one Republican who has been key to preventing filibusters in the past year has raised doubts about whether he will support Mr. Haynes’ confirmation.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, South Carolina Republican, gave Mr. Haynes a tough grilling yesterday in a rare second confirmation hearing before the Judiciary Committee.
Mr. Graham and several other key Republicans have been critical of the way Mr. Haynes and other Pentagon lawyers drafted administration policies for handling battlefield suspects in the war on terror. Mr. Graham said yesterday that internal memos — which were later repudiated by the administration — led at the very least to confusion among U.S. troops over the degree to which prisoners can be interrogated.
“Time and again, on some of the most fundamental questions of law and policy that have come before the Department of Defense, Mr. Haynes has displayed a shocking failure of legal and moral leadership,” said Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat. “It is astounding that the administration would continue to press his nomination, even though the subordinates who have followed the policies he authorized have gone to prison.”
While Mr. Haynes was outright condemned by Democrats on the panel, his sparring with Mr. Graham was the sharpest as the senator tried to determine how involved Mr. Haynes was in the original policy memos.
Later, outside the hearing room, Mr. Graham dodged reporters’ questions about whether he could support the nominee.
“Actions have consequences,” he said.
Further complicating the situation is that Mr. Graham is among the so-called “Gang of 14” senators — seven Democrats and seven Republicans — who have made a pact to prevent filibusters except in the case of “extraordinary circumstances.” In return, Republicans such as Mr. Graham promise not to go along with the “nuclear option” unless Democrats lodge a frivolous filibuster.
After his dust-up with Mr. Haynes at yesterday’s hearing, Mr. Graham declined to even rule out that Mr. Haynes poses the “extraordinary circumstance” that would warrant a filibuster.
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- CHARLES: Holder's undermining of the law deserving of contempt
- Justice at last: 'Evil woman' outed for grabbing girl's game ball
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Former Blue Angels commander relieved of duty for alleged misconduct
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.