D.C. pay increases not based on merit

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

Second of three parts.

No clear link exists between the D.C. government's rising salaries and the performance of city executives enjoying higher wages, city records show.

For example, Lee E. Williams had earned $103,318 a year as the head of the D.C. Taxicab Commission, overseeing 15 employees. The city government boosted his salary by 3.5 percent, to $106,934, last year — just before Mr. Williams was fired for incompetence.

In another example, the D.C. government hired E. Michael Latessa in January 2004 to head the Office of Unified Communications, which handles all of the city's 911 emergency calls. His salary was $111,000.

During his tenure, the agency has been beset with complaints from residents about improperly dispatched calls — from emergency technicians about being sent to incorrect addresses and from call-takers and dispatchers about poor working conditions.

Mr. Latessa, who headed an emergency communications center in Norwalk, Conn., before coming to the District, saw his pay increase by 16 percent, to $129,000 last year, even though he had served only as the agency's acting director and was not confirmed by the D.C. Council until last month.

Lisa Marin, head of the District's Office of Personnel, said the city needs to pay more to attract and retain quality personnel while meeting the governmental needs of a city and of a state. She said that base salaries in the District may be larger than in other jurisdictions, but that lucrative retirement and benefit packages in other jurisdictions bring the total compensation figures in line.

But a review of the city's payroll data and other records show that no consistent criteria can be discerned in the city government's executive salaries.

The Washington Times has obtained payroll information from the D.C. Office of the Chief Financial Officer under a Freedom of Information Act request.

The Times reported yesterday that the D.C. government's payroll grew by 11.6 percent — from $1.55 billion to $1.73 billion — from 2002 to 2005, while its work force declined by 5 percent — from 41,171 workers to 39,088 employees.