Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Bush vetoes stem-cell funding

President Bush yesterday vetoed the first bill of his presidency, rejecting an attempt to overturn his limits on federal support for embryonic-stem-cell research and criticizing opponents in Congress who blocked an alternative measure that would have funded nonembryonic-stem-cell research.

His veto was upheld hours later when the House failed to muster the votes to overturn it. The vote was 235-193, more than 50 votes short of the two-thirds margin the Constitution requires.

“If this bill would have become law, American taxpayers would, for the first time in our history, be compelled to fund the deliberate destruction of human embryos, and I’m not going to allow it,” Mr. Bush said, drawing a standing ovation from supporters in the White House East Room.

He stood in front of a group of parents holding babies that they had adopted as frozen embryos and then had them carried to term.

“These boys and girls are not spare parts,” Mr. Bush said. “They remind us that we all begin our lives as a small collection of cells. And they remind us that in our zeal for new treatments and cures, America must never abandon our fundamental morals.”

The veto means Mr. Bush’s 2001 policy remains in place. It allows federal funding for research on the stem-cell lines that existed at the time, of which there are 21 still usable, but prohibits federal funding for new lines, which require the embryos to be destroyed in the process of extracting the stem cells. Mr. Bush’s policy does not prohibit private or state funding for stem-cell research.

Opponents say the existing stem-cell lines are too limited and are contaminated in some cases and argue that the embryos would otherwise have been discarded. Some estimates say there are 400,000 frozen embryos being held in clinics.

Mr. Bush had gone longer without a veto than any other president since Thomas Jefferson, even though he has issued 141 threats against bills during his more than five years in office.

To overturn a veto, supporters needed to secure two-thirds support in both the House and Senate. Since the bill failed in the House, no vote is needed in the Senate.

Rep. Edward J. Markey, Massachusetts Democrat, called the House’s vote to sustain the veto “a Luddite moment in American history, where fear triumphed over hope and ideology triumphed over science.”

Other Democrats accused Mr. Bush of politicizing science.

“I don’t know who decided they were God and that Congress could not fund this research because their religious thinking trumps the national consensus,” said Rep. Diana DeGette, Colorado Democrat and a chief sponsor of the bill.

She vowed to try again by attaching the measure as an amendment to a bigger bill and hoping Mr. Bush would be reluctant to veto the broader measure.

Democrats also vowed to make Mr. Bush and Republicans pay in this year’s elections.

“This is an issue from one end of the country to the other,” said Sen. Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat and chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • ** FILE ** Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich speaks during a news conference on Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

    Questions surface on Gingrich campaign travel payments

    By Luke Rosiak - The Washington Times

  • U.S. Capitol Police officers keep watch after a 29-year-old Moroccan man was arrested Friday in an FBI sting operation near the Capitol while planning to detonate what police said he thought were live explosives, in Washington, Friday, Feb. 17, 2012. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

    Terror suspect arrested near U.S. Capitol

    By Tom Howell Jr. - The Washington Times

    updated 15 minutes ago

  • Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Associated Press)

    Justice says Supreme Court should revisit campaign finance

    By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          The Political Pro-Con

          Not your typical discussion, writer Conor Murphy writes about the cons, and pros, of politics

          A Heart Without Compromise; Advocating for Children

          Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.