You are currently viewing the printable version of this article, to return to the normal page, please click here.
The Washington Times Online Edition

House ups fines for indecency on airwaves

Question of the Day

Who do you think, among the GOP presidential candidates, will raise the most funds?

View results

The House overwhelmingly approved a bill today that would increase to $325,000 the amount the Federal Communications Commission can fine broadcasters for indecency violations.

The Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act, approved 379-35, represents a tenfold increase over the current maximum fine of $32,500 per violation, which lawmakers and some parent groups had deemed inadequate since Janet Jackson's infamous "wardrobe malfunction" during the 2004 Super Bowl telecast. The law does not apply to cable and satellite broadcasts.

Sponsored by Sen. Sam Brownback, Kansas Republican, the legislation passed the Senate with unanimous consent last month and President Bush is expected to sign it.

"After two years, Congress is sending a bill to the president that will raise broadcast indecency fines to a meaningful level," Mr. Brownback said. "Raising the fines for abusing the public airwaves will hold broadcasters accountable for the content and consequences of their media."

The House passed a tougher bill sponsored by Rep. Fred Upton, Michigan Republican, in February 2005 that would have raised the maximum fine to $500,000 and allowed individual performers, such as radio deejays, to be fined without first receiving a warning, as is currently the case.

"This bill will put a hole in anyone's wallet," said Mr. Upton, adding that House accepted the Senate bill "to get it done" after more than two years of effort and to help "clear the decks and get ready" a major telecommunications reform bill for a possible vote later this week. The stiffer fines are needed at a time when 30-second Super Bowl ads sell for about $2.5 million, he added.

Mr. Upton said he expects President Bush to sign the legislation within the next week.

The FCC defines broadcast indecency as "language or material that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium, sexual or excretory organs or activities."

"Indecent programming contains patently offensive sexual or excretory material that does not rise to the level of obscenity," according to the FCC.

Under federal law, radio stations and over-the-air TV channels cannot air any obscene material, and they cannot air indecent material between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m.

"It was about bloody time -- this ought to have happened two years ago," said L. Brent Bozell, president of the watchdog group Parents Television Council, which has advocated stiffer fines for indecency and led campaigns urging people to contact the FCC with complaints.

Mr. Bozell said the increased fines still may not really hurt the major networks, but should serve as a wake-up call to affiliates "who break the law."

The nation's 13,000 radio stations and 1,700 TV stations preferred self-regulation to government intervention, said National Association of Broadcasters spokesman Dennis Wharton. If the government insists on regulations, they should be applied equally to cable and satellite TV, and satellite radio stations, he added.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Antonya Huntenburg, 21, of Hillsborough, N.J., a student at the Corcoran College of Art and Design, says everyone she knows is under some kind of economic pressure, including her parents. She says she joined the Occupy D.C. encampment on McPherson Square "to be safe." (Rod Lamkey Jr./The Washington Times)

    Youths show economic frustration in streets around the world

    By Patrice Hill - The Washington Times

  • **FILE** Chief Warrant Officer Charlie Morgan attends the OutServe Armed Forces Leadership Summit on Oct. 15, 2011, in Las Vegas. (Associated Press)

    Military gay group growing, aiming for more rights

    By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times

  • ** FILE ** The Rev. William E. Lori, Roman Catholic bishop of Bridgeport, Conn., gestures while testifying on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 16, 2012, before the House Oversight and Government Reform committee hearing: "Lines Crossed: Separation of Church and State. Has the Obama Administration Trampled on Freedom of Religion & Freedom of Conscience." From left are, Lori, the Rev. Dr. Matthew C. Harrison, president of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, and C. Ben Mitchell, professor of Moral Philosophy Union University. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

    Battle lines are drawn over whether Obama is waging a war on religion

    By Cheryl Wetzstein - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Omkara World

          Empowering mind/body/spirit and health dialogue along with cutting-edge, conscious social, political, and world commentary with Adam Omkara. Join the Evolution!

          Legally Speaking

          Despite cynicism about the law, it can provide you justice, protection, and ensure your rights.