- ‘I Am Alive’ app gains popularity in terror-ravaged Lebanon
- Gun giveaways gain popularity among Republican candidates
- S.C. hospital worker slapped with $525 federal fine for refilling $0.89 soda
- Teen from ‘Jihad Jane’ plot becomes youngest ever to serve time on U.S. terror charges
- Iranian woman forgives son’s killer at the gallows
- Nebraska principal sorry for ‘don’t tattle’ flier
- Illinois readies to spend $100M for Obama museum in Chicago
- John Edwards back in court — this time as a lawyer for Va. boy’s malpractice case
- Covered California reports more than 200K in overtime Obamacare sign-ups
- Thanks, Chuck: Hagel says U.S. sending Ukraine sleeping mats, helmets
Senate Democrats push phased Iraq redeployment
Top Senate Democrats, who last week voted against a timetable for withdrawing troops from Iraq, yesterday introduced a measure to start a phased troop redeployment by the end of the year.
Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan said Iraqis must stop looking at the United States as a “security blanket” with an open-ended commitment of support.
“The administration’s policy that we’ll be there as long as Iraq needs us will result in Iraq depending upon us longer,” Mr. Levin said before introducing the amendment to the defense authorization bill being considered this week. “Three and a half years into the conflict, we should tell the Iraqis that the American security blanket is not permanent.”
Mr. Levin said phased redeployment — not a timetable — would encourage the Iraqi leaders to make “hard compromises” and secure their country.
Under the amendment, a phased redeployment of U.S. troops would begin by Dec. 31, when the Bush administration would be required to submit a plan for continued redeployment beyond 2006.
The co-sponsors are Democratic Sens. Jack Reed of Rhode Island, Dianne Feinstein of California and Ken Salazar of Colorado.
Republicans seized on the proposal as “cutting and running.”
“Retreat is not an option,” said Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee. “Those calling for an early withdrawal of American troops from Iraq utterly fail to understand the potentially catastrophic implications of their proposal.”
A White House official last night dismissed the amendment, saying it calls for an arbitrary timeline that will encourage terrorists to wait for the United States to leave. “The choice is to stay and win or to allow Iraq to come become a safe haven for terrorists to plot against the United States,” the official said.
Mr. Reed accused Republicans of using Iraq as a political football.
“Instead of offering a blueprint for success, the Bush administration has used the Iraq debate to attack Democrats for wanting to cut and run,” he said.
Mr. Reed said redeployment should begin “as quickly as possible” to ease the strain on the troops, but added that the measure does not establish a pace.
The measure has Democratic support from Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada and Sens. Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont and Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York.
Mrs. Clinton said the amendment would send the Iraqi government a message that the U.S. commitment is not indefinite and that Iraq must be responsible for its own security, a Clinton staffer said.
None of the amendment’s announced sponsors or supporters backed a withdrawal measure Thursday that failed on a 93-6 vote.
By Joy Overbeck
Redemption by government is futile
- Joe Biden's first Instagram pic mocked as shill for sunglass ad
- BOLTON: A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
- Jews being told to register in Ukraine: John Kerry
- Obama taunts GOP, takes nationally televised victory lap on Obamacare
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- WEBER: Obamacare cuts home healthcare for millions of seniors
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Atheists rush to stage Easter display: 'Jesus Christ is a myth'
- Cliven Bundy's Nevada ranch wrecked by retreating feds
- Rand and Ron Paul ride to the rescue for Bundy in Nevada standoff with feds
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.