The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    Voight, tea party groups plan last-minute protest

  • Politics

    CURL: Obama the Innocent stumps for health care

  • Politics

    Key Democrat Boccieri switches to 'yes' on health vote

  • Commentary

    TURNER: Our lawbreaking Congress

  • Energy

    Obama backs plan to legalize illegals

  • World

    Gitmo suspects allowed laptops while in custody

  • Politics

    Health-vote ally Nelson to get new VA hospital for Nebraska

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Court rejects spending limits for candidates

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Stories

  • Voight, tea party groups plan last-minute protest
  • Judge rejects settlement for 9/11 rescuers
  • URS, Minnesota settle suit over bridge collapse
  • Key Democrat Boccieri switches to 'yes' on health vote

By

The Supreme Court yesterday ruled that the government cannot set limits on a political candidate's spending, overturning a Vermont law, and that the state set too strict a limit on donations to campaigns.

In a 6-3 ruling, the court said the money that a campaign spends is a matter of free speech, reaffirming the 1976 Buckley case that defined modern campaign-finance law. The court also ruled that Vermont's limit of $200 to $400 for donations to campaigns -- the strictest in the country -- was too low, although some limit is permissible.

"We must recognize the existence of some lower bound," Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote in the controlling opinion for the court. "At some point, the constitutional risks to the democratic electoral process become too great."

It was the first time that the court has addressed major campaign-finance issues since 2003, when the court upheld the McCain-Feingold campaign-finance law, which restricts the ways that national political parties and interest groups raise and spend money.

The decision was fractured, with six justices writing opinions. Justice Breyer's plurality opinion was joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., both of whom were sworn in within the past year.

Justices Anthony M. Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia agreed with Justice Breyer's conclusion but said the Buckley case, which distinguished between individual donors' spending and candidates' spending, should be scrapped.

Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David H. Souter dissented, arguing that the court should defer to Vermont lawmakers.

The Vermont law's supporters said the statute was needed to prevent political corruption.

"Instead of allowing us to level the playing field, the justices have pushed average folks to the sidelines and preserved a clear path to power for wealthy donors," said Paul Burns, executive director of the Vermont Public Interest Research Group, which backed the law.

But James Bopp Jr., the lead counsel who challenged the law, said the court ruling put the First Amendment back into campaign-finance law.

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  2. EDITORIAL: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow
  3. Obama backs plan to legalize illegals
  4. RUSE: The Girl Scout Sex Guide
  5. Gitmo suspects allowed laptops while in custody
More Top Stories »
  1. TURNER: Our lawbreaking Congress
  2. PRUDEN: Into the twilight zone
  3. Elvis shakes up press again at Newseum
  4. EDITORIAL: WWII: The most racist generation
  5. Health-vote ally Nelson to get new VA hospital for Nebraska

Most Commented

  1. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  2. Obama backs plan to legalize illegals
  3. EDITORIAL: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow
  4. Gitmo suspects allowed laptops while in custody
  5. Health-vote ally Nelson to get new VA hospital for Nebraska
More Top Stories »
  1. Democrats make final push on health care
  2. Poll finds stubborn suspicion of census
  3. EDITORIAL: WWII: The most racist generation
  4. Group condemns textbooks about Islam
  5. Voight, tea party groups plan last-minute protest

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Issa: Giving back a bribe for a vote changes nothing

  • Belief Blog

    Nancy Pelosi invokes the 'wrong' St. Joseph

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.