The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    GOP to use amendments as tactic

  • Investigation

    Pakistani bank's ex-chief may be extradited

  • Security

    Justice, CIA clash over probe of interrogator IDs

  • Politics

    GOP move on pork pressures Obama

  • National

    Senate chided for slow OK of border chief

  • Business

    China's yuan value hits U.S. economy, two experts say

  • National

    Suicides spur review of Massachusetts bullying bill

Friday, March 10, 2006

Bungled deal overshadowed GOP agenda

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Stories

  • Census forms arrive in the mail: What to expect
  • Mistress wanted Edwards to quit race
  • China's yuan value hits U.S. economy, two experts say
  • Suicides spur review of Massachusetts bullying bill

By

The ports deal was bungled from the beginning, but it became doomed after congressional offices were flooded with calls and the news began to crowd out the rest of Republicans' agenda.

"I don't know if we do a postmortem or the rigor mortis on this," said Rep. Mark Foley, Florida Republican and one of the earliest opponents.

He said the calls to his office were so overwhelming that it was comparable to when Republicans impeached President Clinton. But that time opinion was divided, whereas for the ports deal there was a "universal audience of antagonism -- 'What are you all thinking of up there?' "

Lawmakers yesterday were waiting to see exactly how DP World planned to divest itself of operations at six U.S. ports, and many said the issue will not go away.

In the meantime, they said, the deal was a wake-up call to Congress and to President Bush, who they said was ill-served by his administration because staffers didn't see the political context and didn't bring it to the attention of top-level officials.

"Considering we live in a dangerous world and remain a nation at war, the fact that a sale of this magnitude can be fully vetted and approved without the knowledge of one Cabinet secretary, Congress or the president is a clear indication that the system is broken," said Rep. J. Gresham Barrett, South Carolina Republican.

The issue gave Democrats a chance to try to position themselves as stronger on national security than the president, and left Republicans worrying about sending mixed messages on the one issue they thought they had a lock on.

More than two weeks ago, Mr. Bush told reporters if he was presented with a bill blocking the deal, "I'll deal with it, with a veto."

But he found himself in the line of fire from Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill. Senate Republicans seemed to accept a new 45-day investigation by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), but House Republicans -- all of whom are up for re-election in November -- wanted the deal blocked outright.

House Republicans openly talked about overriding a veto and set up such a confrontation Wednesday, pushing for an amendment to the emergency war-spending bill that would block the DP World deal. It passed 62-2 in the House Appropriations Committee, with just one Republican and one Democrat opposed.

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. KUHNER: A gangster regime
  2. LAMBRO: Roberts for the defense
  3. EDITORIAL: Holding Holder in contempt
  4. EDITORIAL: Obama's sick obsession
  5. WOLF: Obama family health care fracas
More Top Stories »
  1. Justice, CIA clash over probe of interrogator IDs
  2. GOP to use amendments as tactic
  3. Pakistani bank's ex-chief may be extradited
  4. EDITORIAL: Pocket money for politicians
  5. PRUDEN: 'Tis better to kill the health care corpse now

Most Commented

  1. Pelosi confident House will pass health care
  2. EDITORIAL: Obama's sick obsession
  3. Utah lawmaker resigns in hot-tub incident
  4. Texas adopts conservative curriculum
  5. EDITORIAL: Holding Holder in contempt
More Top Stories »
  1. Sen. Brown bashes 'bitter' health push
  2. LAMBRO: Roberts for the defense
  3. GOP to use amendments as tactic
  4. Senate, Obama spar over health plan's pet projects
  5. Prius case leaves questions hanging

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Dems flying blind, failure of Hillarycare ‘relieved’ most Americans

  • Belief Blog

    Sayonara to the president's faith-based council

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.