




House and Senate leaders take a major spending test this week as they try to complete a hurricane and war emergency-funding bill, but face tough negotiations over billions of dollars in extra, unrelated items that the Senate added to its version of the bill.
President Bush has threatened to veto the final bill if it doesn’t comply with his $92.2 billion limit, plus $2.3 billion for pandemic flu efforts. He reiterated his concern yesterday in a regularly scheduled White House meeting with Republican leaders.
“He wants it down,” House Majority Leader John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, said, referring to the Senate’s steep price tag.
The House-passed version is in line with Mr. Bush, at about $92 billion, but the Senate-passed version is about $109 billion and contains many extra items including $4 billion for agriculture assistance, $1.1 billion for fisheries and $700 million to reroute a railroad in Mississippi.
House leaders yesterday reiterated a hard line on the bill.
“Our constituents don’t want to hear about some out-of-control spending bill. The Senate bill is bloated and excessive,” said House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, Illinois Republican.
House and Senate spending chiefs have agreed to come down to Mr. Bush’s number but are now fighting over which items get axed from the bill, which was designed to fund hurricane recovery and the war on terrorism.
The House officially appointed negotiators yesterday, indicating a deal may be possible before the Memorial Day break.
“We are very hopeful, but I wouldn’t say for sure yet,” Mr. Boehner said.
Critics of the railroad money have dubbed it the “railroad to nowhere,” and House Republicans strongly oppose it. But it’s backed by the powerful Senate Appropriations Chairman Thad Cochran, Mississippi Republican.
A Senate Republican leadership aide said the House won’t pass a final bill with the railroad money in it.
The aide also said the agriculture money will likely be reduced.
Complicating negotiations further is $1.9 billion in border-security funding that Mr. Bush last week requested be included in the bill. The administration suggested funding it by reducing a portion of defense-related spending in the bill.
The last-minute addition has “slowed things down a lot,” another top Senate Republican aide said.
Meanwhile last night, the House passed a $94 billion agriculture spending bill 378-46, but only after conservatives tried to crack down on what they called frivolous spending.
View Entire StoryBy Julia A. Seymour
Planned Parenthood flap preceded by assault from anti-chemical activists

By Geir Moulson - Associated Press
German President Christian Wulff resigned Friday in a scandal over favors he allegedly received before ...

By Rich Campbell - The Washington Times
Imagine this: Peyton Manning coming out of the tunnel at FedEx Field this September, poised ...

By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times
When Lt. j.g. Timothy W. Dorsey fired his fighter jet’s missile at an Air Force ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

A politically conservative and morally liberal Hebrew alpha male hunts left-wing vipers.

You don’t have to be a super-parent to make baby happy. Get pointers on parenting tips to make life easier.

An inside look at the world highlighting not only green issues affecting us all, but everything from green travel to green technology.