Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

House GOP expected to yield on legislation

The House is the only obstacle that stands between President Bush and a comprehensive immigration bill, and the White House yesterday predicted that the chamber’s Republicans will give in.

White House press secretary Tony Snow said House Republicans will want to pass border security badly enough to back down from the fight against what many consider amnesty for illegal aliens, knowing there is a “heavier political price for failing to act, than for acting.”

“If you are a Republican member of Congress and you’re concerned about illegal immigration, do you really want to say to your constituents: You know, I’m going to wait a couple of years before I take up the issue of people knowingly hiring illegal aliens, I want to wait a couple of years before I go ahead and try to identify who the illegal aliens are, I want to wait a couple of years before I start grappling with what to do with these 11 or 12 million people who are here illegally,” Mr. Snow said.

A president always has the most influence in the backroom House-Senate negotiations, but yesterday, Mr. Snow wouldn’t tip the administration’s hand when asked how they would approach the conference committee.

“At this point, let’s get a bill through the Senate, let’s figure out where the fault lines are,” he said.

But those fault lines between the House and Senate are fairly public, deep and fundamental.

The House passed a bill in December that stepped up border enforcement and interior enforcement, enabled local law enforcement in border areas to help enforce immigration laws and cracked down on employers who hired illegal aliens.

The Senate included some of those measures but put far more emphasis on future foreign workers and a pathway to citizenship for the current estimated 10 million to 12 million illegal aliens, a move House Republicans consider an unacceptable amnesty.

“If both parties in a negotiation are running the other way, they will never meet in any middle,” said Don Stewart, spokesman for Sen. John Cornyn, Texas Republican.

“The question for the House is some agreement to do more than just border security. The question for the Senate is: Are they willing to be less generous than the Senate bill? Without a yes on both of those two questions, there’s no point in the conference going forward.”

From the House side, Majority Leader John A. Boehner acknowledged there were “two very separate and distinct directions that we’re going,” but said he still thinks they can reach an agreement with the Senate.

Still, the Ohio Republican said, the House position is clear.

“You can’t control the problem without first strengthening the borders and beginning to enforce the laws,” said Mr. Boehner.

Mr. Bush last week called the Senate measure “a good immigration bill.” He also recently reversed his administration’s earlier position and now endorses the idea of a path to citizenship for some illegal aliens.

He said any final bill must include border security, employer sanctions, a temporary-worker program and a way to handle the current illegal alien population.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • ** FILE ** Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich speaks during a news conference on Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

    Questions surface on Gingrich campaign travel payments

    By Luke Rosiak - The Washington Times

  • This artist rendering shows Amine El Khalifi before U.S. District Judge T. Rawles Jones Jr. in federal court in Alexandria, Va., Friday, Feb. 17, 2012. El Khalifi, a 29-year-old Moroccan man was arrested Friday near the U.S. Capitol as he was planning to detonate what he thought was a suicide vest, given to him by FBI undercover operatives, said police and government officials. (AP Photo/Dana Verkouteren)

    Terror suspect arrested near U.S. Capitol

    By Tom Howell Jr. - The Washington Times

  • Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Associated Press)

    Justice says Supreme Court should revisit campaign finance

    By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          The Political Pro-Con

          Not your typical discussion, writer Conor Murphy writes about the cons, and pros, of politics

          A Heart Without Compromise; Advocating for Children

          Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.