- George Zimmerman will not be charged in domestic dispute
- Russian officials press bilateral U.S. trade deal
- Creator of ‘Selfies at Funerals’ blog retires after Obama flub: ‘Our work here is done’
- New Obama adviser Podesta is against Keystone but will steer clear of pipeline deliberations
- 40 Australian adults, children found in ‘one of the worst accounts of incest ever made public’
- Venezuela’s Maduro calls on student ‘price vigilantes’ to hit the streets, report businesses
- Atheists smug as Hindus join Satanists to demand display at Oklahoma Statehouse
- Bow before Valkyrie, NASA’s ‘superhero robot’ entry in DARPA challenge
- 10-year-old Pennsylvania boy suspended for pretend bow-and-arrow shooting
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
Senate rolls out the pork barrel — again
Question of the Day
The Republican-controlled Senate continues to cram billions of dollars for non-emergency programs into the emergency supplemental-appropriations bill, despite the fact that it is Republicans who are in danger of marching over the electoral cliff in less than six months.
President Bush initially requested $92.2 billion in emergency spending, which was divided between military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan ($72.4 billion) and hurricane relief ($19.8 billion). The House version ($91.9 billion), which was passed in March, actually came in below the president’s request. The president later said he would accept an additional $2.3 billion for pandemic flu protection, bringing the White House total to $94.5. In early April, by a vote of 27-1, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved a bill totaling $106.5 billion. Anything higher than $94.5 billion, the president warned on April 25, would elicit a veto.
The next day, in a bipartisan 72-26 vote, the Senate rejected an amendment that would have limited its emergency-spending bill to $94.5 billion. The bipartisan big spenders in the Senate then proceeded to add billions more, ignoring a second veto threat issued Wednesday. “If they spend more than $92.2 billion plus pandemic flu emergency funds, I will veto this bill,” warned Mr. Bush, who has never vetoed a bill despite the fact that annual federal spending has increased nearly 50 percent (about $850 billion) during the five budgets he has overseen.
Earlier this week, the Senate passed its emergency-spending bill totaling $108.9 billion, nearly $15 billion above the president’s bottom line. The additional spending includes $4 billion for farmers, $1.1 billion for Gulf Coast fisheries, $1 billion in grants to states and Mississippi Republican Sens. Trent Lott and Thad Cochran’s infamous $700 million “Railroad to Nowhere” earmark to relocate Mississippi railroad tracks, which were only recently rebuilt at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars after Hurricane Katrina.
Before facing the president’s veto pen, the Senate bill must now be reconciled in conference committee with the far more responsible House version. House Majority Leader John Boehner drew a line in the sand following this week’s action by the Senate: “The House will not take up an emergency supplemental spending bill for Katrina and the war in Iraq that spends one dollar more than what the president asked for. Period.” That’s a very good start. For the record, 34 Republican senators voted for the $108.9 billion bill, including presidential aspirants George Allen, Sam Brownback and Rick Santorum; other Republicans included Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley and Majority Whip Mitch McConnell, and Robert Bennett, John Cornyn, James Inhofe and Pat Roberts.
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
- Rand Paul: Budget deal 'shameful,' 'huge mistake'
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- Teen thugs in D.C. run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Obama's antics at Nelson Mandela tribute: Jovial conversation, handshake with Raul Castro
- American bourbon now better than Scottish whisky: U.K.-born expert
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Study IDs reasons for late-term abortions
- Inside the Ring: China targets Global Hawk drone
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Al Maurer provides a common sense, conservatarian, Constitutional conservative perspective from the battleground state of Colorado
Interviews and show reviews from the Los Angeles punk scene past and present. Los Angeles has always been rich in punk rock talent since punk rock was born.
Buzz on Bees is a column promoting the love and life of God’s greatest pollinators on earth: The Honeybee
Brazen, leading-edge, “call it like it is” columns and reporting from Ohio native, radio host and writer, Sara Marie Brenner.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow