- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Fence funding in budget just the start
Question of the Day
President Bush has signed off on a small down payment for a 700-mile fence along the U.S.-Mexico border, but legislators and fence advocates worry the barrier will never be fully funded and fear a lack of White House commitment.
Lawmakers — including Rep. Duncan Hunter, California Republican and chairman of the House Armed Services Committee — are forcefully reminding the Bush administration and Homeland Security officials that Congress’ “directive” that the fence be built is not optional.
“We didn’t put the fence as a goal or an option or something that should be mixed with other solutions, we made it mandatory,” Mr. Hunter told The Washington Times yesterday.
“It is not an option for the Department of Homeland Security. What part of ‘shall’ don’t they understand?”
The $33.8 billion Homeland Security funding bill, signed by Mr. Bush with much fanfare during ceremonies in Arizona last week, proposed $1.2 billion for fencing along with lighting, roads, sensors, cameras and other security devices. It does not include actual authorization on how, when or where it should be built.
The House- and Senate-approved Secure Fence Act does that. It outlines specifics on the fence’s construction but has not been sent to the president, who has vowed to sign it.
Most proponents and opponents agree that the proposed $1.2 billion allocation is far short of the up to $12 billion it will take to build 700 miles of fencing, and some advocates have questioned both the White House and Congress’ commitment to it.
“Where the fence is concerned, to borrow a quote from the movies, ‘Show me the money,’” said Michael W. Cutler, a 31-year Immigration and Naturalization Service veteran who spent most of his career as a criminal investigator and intelligence specialist.
Members of Congress said they will have to revisit the funding every year.
“It’s one thing to authorize. It’s another thing to actually appropriate the money and do it,” Sen. John Cornyn, Texas Republican and a supporter of fencing, said last week.
In a terse, three-paragraph note Friday to Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, Mr. Hunter noted that Homeland Security has been given flexibility on the exact location of the 700 miles of fencing, but that its actual construction “is not in dispute.”
“Congress has explicitly stated that border fencing is a critical component of our national border security plan,” wrote Mr. Hunter, the act’s lead proponent. He also reminded Mr. Chertoff that he is required within 60 days of the bill’s passage to submit to the House Appropriations Committee “an expenditure plan for establishing a security barrier along the border of the United States.”
In a report accompanying the bill, Congress said it willwithhold $950 million of the allocation until that plan is received and approved.
Yesterday, Mr. Hunter said Congress went through a similar fight with the Clinton administration in the 1990s, when he fought for fencing between San Diego and Tijuana, Mexico.
“With each administration, you have a new set of administrators who don’t have a lengthy experience on the border and tend to be duly impressed with the sales pitches made by the high-tech companies,” he said. “Those sales pitches usually don’t include something as mundane as a fence. But fences work.”
President wants everyone but himself to pay more
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of politicizing business
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq