

The White House is pleading with Congress to send over the bill authorizing 700 miles of fence on the U.S.-Mexico border so the president can sign it immediately, but Republican leaders on Capitol Hill want to wait until closer to the election and to have a public signing ceremony.
“Send us the damn bill. We’d like to autograph it,” said a senior administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to allow for more freedom to discuss politics and policy.
“Our object was to sign it last week so we can have port security and border security together and herald an effort to control all of the borders of the United States. We even had ways to talk about what we were doing at the airports,” the official said.
Congressional Republicans, though, are convinced the issue is a political winner and want to hold onto the bill so it will be signed closer to next month’s congressional elections. Once the bill is sent to the president, he has a limited amount of time to sign it before it dies as a pocket veto.
“It’s a timing issue: We want it signed closer to the election when folks are paying attention and those who want to take advantage of the messaging opportunity can do so, and the White House is aware of this,” said an aide to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, Tennessee Republican. House Republican leadership aides confirmed that strategy.
Mr. Bush has already signed a spending bill with money for some fencing, but has yet to sign the bill actually authorizing the double-wall fence along nearly 700 miles of the border. Congress passed both bills in the waning days of the legislative session last month.
Many blogs from across the political spectrum have speculated he is trying to scuttle the bill with a pocket veto, but Mr. Bush has said he will sign it, though in private, without a signing ceremony.
Congressional Republicans said that is a bad move at a critical political time.
“A public signing ceremony with the maximum amount of fanfare in a high-profile place would be the best thing the president could do to help out Republicans who are having trouble in their re-elections,” said Rep. Steve King, Iowa Republican, adding that such a ceremony would go a long way to counteract cynicism from voters who question the White House’s commitment to border security.
“People think we’re not going to get it done,” he said.
The bill’s actual status is somewhat murky. Calls to the House clerk’s office were referred to the House Administration Committee, and a spokeswoman was not able to say where the bill was.
Mr. King said he has assigned his staff to track down the bill because he, too, wants to know where it stands.
The Bush administration official said the bill’s status has been explained several times, but “I for the life of me could not explain it to you.”
The official rejected a signing ceremony, and said the White House doesn’t want voters to expect too much out of the wall.
“We’ve got to be careful,” the official said. “We are doing a lot on the border, and we cannot raise expectations that this bill of 700 miles of fence is going to happen immediately.”
View Entire StoryPresident is violating religious freedom for an ineffective plan

By Ashish Kumar Sen - The Washington Times
The U.S. and Pakistan need to reset their strategic relationship, which has been “burdened” with ...

By Shaun Waterman - The Washington Times
The Department of Homeland Security program that secures the nation’s chemical plants against terrorist attacks ...

By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times
Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, under fire from Congress and veterans for naming ships after fellow ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

Find up-to-date information on the D.C. and Baltimore live music scenes and read interviews with artists and reviews of the latest releases and concerts.

A politically conservative and morally liberal Hebrew alpha male hunts left-wing vipers.