- Congressman: McAuliffe victory means gun control a winning message
- Clinton aide admits soliciting disgraced D.C. fundraiser; says actions were legal
- Joel Osteen church victimized in $600K theft
- Obama goes shopping at Gap as minimum-wage thanks
- N.J. woman charged after client dies from black-market butt injections
- CIA chief Brennan ‘determined’ to speak out more this year
- Reset? What reset? U.S.-Russia ties at worst since Cold War
- 9/11 terror recruiter released in Syrian prisoner swap
- D.C. elections board gives green light to marijuana legalization initiative
- Elephants can tell difference between human languages: study
Anti-secrecy panel called ‘puppet’
A panel set up last year to reduce excessive secrecy in government is being labeled toothless after its chairman told lawmakers that he could not act except at the request of the president.
“The statute under which we operate provides that [President Bush] must request the board undertake such a review before it can proceed,” wrote L. Britt Snider, chairman of the Public Interest Declassification Board, to Sen. Ron Wyden, Oregon Democrat.
Government transparency advocates say that if the statute is interpreted that way, it makes the board, in the words of Steven Aftergood, of the Federation of American Scientists, “a White House puppet.”
Mr. Aftergood said, “The board needs the capacity for independent action; otherwise it might as well not exist.”
The letter from Mr. Snider says it is “an interim response” to a request from Mr. Wyden and a bipartisan group of colleagues for the board to review two reports from the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that assessed U.S. intelligence about Iraq before the 2003 invasion, in the light of what has been learned since.
“We believe that portions of these two reports remain unnecessarily classified,” wrote committee members Sens. Christopher S. Bond, Missouri Republican; Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat; Mike DeWine, Ohio Republican; Russ Feingold, Wisconsin Democrat; Orrin G. Hatch, Utah Republican; and Vice Chairman John D. Rockefeller IV, West Virginia Democrat, in a letter last month.
They requested that the board review the reports to see whether they were overclassified — the first test of the board’s role as a watchdog for secrecy policy.
“I think the intelligence community used their black highlighters excessively as they reviewed these reports,” Mr. Wyden said at the time. “I am particularly concerned it appears that information may have been classified to shield individuals from accountability.”
The board was established in law in 2000, after a 1997 recommendation from a commission headed by Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan, New York Democrat. The board was set up, according to the statute, “To promote the fullest possible public access to a thorough, accurate, and reliable documentary record of significant U.S. national security decisions and … activities.”
But the administration did not appoint any members until September 2004, and no funds were appropriated for it until last year.
Now the board says it is stuck in the middle of a tussle about its authority between lawmakers and the White House.
“The White House position is they have to request “any review such as that of the Senate committee report,” Mr. Snider said. “The senators believe they can ask independently. … We’re kind of stuck in the middle.”
Mr. Snider said the board was “waiting for guidance from the White House” about how to proceed. The board’s executive secretary, J. William Leonard, added that the board was keen to get things right the first time around.
“There’s a desire that [this first request] is processed in accordance with the statute, because it will be establishing a precedent,” he said.
An America drowning in red ink is the land of the free no more
- Inside the Beltway: A new interest in Rahm Emanuel for 2016?
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- David Jolly wins in Florida, GOP keeps swing district seat
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- 80 people publicly executed across North Korea for films, Bibles
- Liam Neeson tells NYC mayor to 'man up' in horse carriage fight
- House Democrats trying to force unemployment insurance vote
- Atheists sue to remove 'Ground Zero Cross' from 9/11 museum
- Florida lawmakers move to wipe corrupt 'Boss Hogg' town from map
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again