- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Lost in the swamp
Question of the Day
EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J.
No stadium holds worse memories for Joe Gibbs than this aging structure in the swamps of New Jersey.
The Hall of Fame coach owns only a 6-10 record at Giants Stadium, and yesterday’s 19-3 loss has to be one of the most discouraging of those defeats.
To be sure, there have been bad losses here before for the Redskins, even recently.
The Redskins lost 20-14 at Giants Stadium two years ago in the first road game of the Gibbs II era. That defeat, at least, could be explained away by seven turnovers and an injury to quarterback Mark Brunell.
The Redskins lost 36-0 here last year, a debacle against a Giants team inspired by the death five days earlier of beloved owner Wellington Mara.
There are, however, no easy answers for what happened yesterday.
The Redskins came in on a roll, having gained 976 yards and scored 67 points in back-to-back victories over the Texans and Jaguars. The Giants, meanwhile, used a bye last week to ponder their 42-30 destruction at the hands of the Seahawks on Sept. 24.
The Giants certainly needed a victory more: They were 1-2, playing at home and faced with a tough road game against the Falcons next week. The Redskins, by contrast, were 2-2 and face a lightweight Titans team at FedEx Field on Sunday.
The Giants didn’t produce much in the first half, settling for three field goals. But the Redskins had even fewer opportunities.
“It seemed like we didn’t have any fire today,” Redskins receiver Antwaan Randle El said. “We were clicking the last two games, but at the same time, it just doesn’t happen. Somebody has to make a big play to get it going. We didn’t have that today. I don’t understand it.”
Defensive end Phillip Daniels couldn’t disagree.
“At halftime, we felt we were still in the game,” Daniels said. “We needed one play, but that one play never came.”
The Giants didn’t make a lot of those plays, either. But they made at least some, whereas the Redskins did nothing: The Giants produced four catches of at least 20 yards, the Redskins none. The Giants scored one touchdown, the Redskins none. The Giants sacked the opposing quarterback three times, the Redskins none.
Notice a trend here? If it were baseball, the game would have been an 8-0 New York shutout.
President wants everyone but himself to pay more
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Afghan who killed three U.S. Marines in 2012 to serve over 7-year prison sentence
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq