- Obama downplays IRS scandal, blames Obamacare rollout on ‘outdated’ agencies
- Pregnancies decline overall, up among older women
- Pentagon plans to destroy Syrian chemical arms on ship at sea
- Paris Metro issues ‘politeness manual’ to improve passengers’ behavior
- Justin Bieber, crew detained at Australian airport in drug search
- Lee Rigby trial: Muslim who machete-hacked soldier calls it ‘humane’ kill
- GM ending Chevy sales in Europe to focus on Opel and Vauxhall
- Putin’s diplomats to U.S. busted for living high life off $1.5M bilked from Medicaid
- Happy Meal: Couple goes to McDonald’s, leaves with bag packed with cash
- Boehner: It took me 3 to 4 hours to sign up for Obamacare
Panel OKs bill on terror suspects
A House panel yesterday approved a bill backing the Bush administration’s approach to the treatment of terrorism suspects, although the number of Republican lawmakers breaking with the White House on the issue is growing.
The House Judiciary Committee approved on a 20-19 vote a bill that would closely follow Bush administration requests on guidelines for interrogations and trials of detainees in the war on terrorism, with Democrats picking up two Republicans to oppose it.
Earlier in the day the Republican-controlled committee hadn’t mustered enough votes to approve it because a few Republicans were absent, and the bill was killed, 20-17. After rounding up their troops, Republicans held a series of procedural votes and eventually approved the measure.
The embarrassing struggle hinted of a tough road ahead for the House bill. Opponents yesterday argued that the administration and its congressional allies are trying to redefine U.S. obligations under the Geneva Conventions in order to give terrorism detainees fewer rights and the government more leeway in how to treat them.
“If we dilute … the Geneva Conventions, other countries will feel inclined to do the same,” said Rep. Jeff Flake, an Arizona Republican who voted against the bill, along with Rep. Bob Inglis, South Carolina Republican. Mr. Flake predicted Congress will ultimately endorse a bill like the Senate version, which affords more civil rights to the detainees and rejects Mr. Bush’s definition of detainee treatment.
“I think this is where we’re going to end up,” he said.
The administration has said the Senate bill — written by Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John W. Warner, Virginia Republican — would limit intelligence gathering and expose classified information to terrorists. Mr. Warner and a group of Senate Republicans continued their talks yesterday with White House officials as they strive to reach a deal.
Many House Republicans defended Mr. Bush yesterday — arguing that although terrorism suspects should be treated and tried fairly, military officials must be given enough freedom to interrogate and gather information needed to protect the country.
“What we’re trying to do is strike a balance,” said Rep. J. Randy Forbes, Virginia Republican. “I’d rather err on the side of protecting our citizens.”
House Majority Leader John A. Boehner said the House bill is expected to come to a House vote next week and “provides the president with crucial tools for waging and winning the global war on terror.” In a political jab, he attacked Judiciary Committee Democrats for opposing it, but didn’t mention the Republicans who did or the initial committee vote.
“Today’s vote by Democrats to unanimously oppose this bill is just one more in a long line of troubling actions that weaken our ability to wage and win the global war on terror, and it underscores why Americans don’t trust Democrats on important national security issues,” said the Ohio Republican.
Democrats had harsh words for the administration and Republicans.
Rep. Jerrold Nadler, New York Democrat, said the “lawless” administration has tortured detainees and now wants Congress to approve more of the same. “That’s what this debate is all about,” he said.
He and other Democrats tried unsuccessfully yesterday to kill a provision in the bill that would bar the detainees from suing the government for their detention, treatment or conditions where they were held.
Meanwhile, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence gave voice-vote approval to a bill that would make lawful the administration’s program of warrantless wiretapping of terrorism suspects. Rep. Heather A. Wilson, New Mexico Republican, rewrote the bill to make it more acceptable to Mr. Bush.
Why such hatred toward America's freedom of religion?
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality: liberal group
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
- NAPOLITANO: Pope Francis should be saving souls, not pocketbooks
- CARSON: Getting to the top by starting at the bottom
- Activists encourage Obama to circumvent Congress, use more executive authority
- Russian diplomats busted bilking $1.5 million from Medicaid
- Democratic infighting erupts over 'we can have it all' fantasy on entitlements
- Obama returns to class warfare as poll numbers plunge
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Obama lived with Uncle Onyango Obama in the 1980s, White House admits
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.
Understanding economic events with a free market explanation
John Wood illustrates a new American politics, and the path to get there.
Interviews and show reviews from the Los Angeles punk scene past and present. Los Angeles has always been rich in punk rock talent since punk rock was born.
White House pets gone wild!