- Unbeliebable: White House turns Bieber petition response into immigration screed
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador’s visa, but says law is ‘advisory’
- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
Chertoff, Democrats disagree over cargo scans
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff yesterday sparred with Democratic lawmakers over the feasibility of scanning cargo for nuclear materials at foreign ports before ships depart for the United States.
Mr. Chertoff told the House Homeland Security Committee that total screening is unrealistic and that other measures are being implemented to protect U.S. ports from such terrorist threats.
Cargo is screened by manifest and cargo lists, but is not scanned for radiation until it reaches U.S. ports, where Mr. Chertoff said the goal is to screen 80 percent of the cargo by year’s end.
“Why can’t we do it on the other side of the ocean before they depart?” asked Rep. Peter A. DeFazio of Oregon. “Why has there been resistance on the part of the administration and the majority here, to screening all the containers on the other side of the ocean?”
In response, Mr. Chertoff said, “For one thing, we don’t own foreign ports, Congressman.”
The hearing focused on the department’s goals for 2007, including border protection, and members on both sides of the aisle asked that grants to various cities, including Washington, be increased.
Mr. Chertoff said U.S. and foreign officials soon will conduct some screening at the ship’s point of departure, but the answer did not satisfy Mr. DeFazio.
“We retain the right of sovereignty in international trade and we can refuse the entry of any cargo,” said the Oregon Democrat. “The Chinese regularly do this for commercial purposes; we can sure as heck do it for homeland security purposes.
“Anybody who isn’t cooperating with us, we say, ‘Well, that’s fine, but guess what? Nothing’s leaving your port to the United States of America anymore.’ It’s pretty simple.”
Such action, Mr. Chertoff said, would cut off 75 percent of international trade and lead to a depressed economy.
Mr. DeFazio proposed a three-year period to implement such a strategy, but Mr. Chertoff balked and called it an “artificial deadline” that would be “as unrealistic as passing a law that says in three years cancer has to be cured.”
Rep. Edward J. Markey, Massachusetts Democrat, called Mr. Chertoff’s statements “a terrible message.”
“You are saying that after the terrorists are in the air coming to the United States from another country that it’s already too late, that the same thing is also true with a nuclear bomb in a ship heading for a port in the United States,” he said.
The Homeland Security secretary said officials are meeting with shippers and foreign governments to better secure cargo.
One constraint is that some ports are on land already “full of radioactive material” that would constantly set off false alarms.
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- EDITORIAL: More Lerner smoking-gun emails at IRS
- Nancy Pelosi washes immigrants' feet in humble Holy Week act then promotes on Twitter
- Former Blue Angels commander relieved of duty for alleged misconduct
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.