- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
- Tea Party Patriots call key GOP firing a declaration of war
Chertoff, Democrats disagree over cargo scans
Question of the Day
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff yesterday sparred with Democratic lawmakers over the feasibility of scanning cargo for nuclear materials at foreign ports before ships depart for the United States.
Mr. Chertoff told the House Homeland Security Committee that total screening is unrealistic and that other measures are being implemented to protect U.S. ports from such terrorist threats.
Cargo is screened by manifest and cargo lists, but is not scanned for radiation until it reaches U.S. ports, where Mr. Chertoff said the goal is to screen 80 percent of the cargo by year’s end.
“Why can’t we do it on the other side of the ocean before they depart?” asked Rep. Peter A. DeFazio of Oregon. “Why has there been resistance on the part of the administration and the majority here, to screening all the containers on the other side of the ocean?”
In response, Mr. Chertoff said, “For one thing, we don’t own foreign ports, Congressman.”
The hearing focused on the department’s goals for 2007, including border protection, and members on both sides of the aisle asked that grants to various cities, including Washington, be increased.
Mr. Chertoff said U.S. and foreign officials soon will conduct some screening at the ship’s point of departure, but the answer did not satisfy Mr. DeFazio.
“We retain the right of sovereignty in international trade and we can refuse the entry of any cargo,” said the Oregon Democrat. “The Chinese regularly do this for commercial purposes; we can sure as heck do it for homeland security purposes.
“Anybody who isn’t cooperating with us, we say, ‘Well, that’s fine, but guess what? Nothing’s leaving your port to the United States of America anymore.’ It’s pretty simple.”
Such action, Mr. Chertoff said, would cut off 75 percent of international trade and lead to a depressed economy.
Mr. DeFazio proposed a three-year period to implement such a strategy, but Mr. Chertoff balked and called it an “artificial deadline” that would be “as unrealistic as passing a law that says in three years cancer has to be cured.”
Rep. Edward J. Markey, Massachusetts Democrat, called Mr. Chertoff’s statements “a terrible message.”
“You are saying that after the terrorists are in the air coming to the United States from another country that it’s already too late, that the same thing is also true with a nuclear bomb in a ship heading for a port in the United States,” he said.
The Homeland Security secretary said officials are meeting with shippers and foreign governments to better secure cargo.
One constraint is that some ports are on land already “full of radioactive material” that would constantly set off false alarms.
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- N. Korean news agency: Kim Jong Un's uncle executed
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- White House improvises again on patchy Obamacare rollout
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Jane Fonda Foundation fails to make single contribution in 5 years: report
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.
An informed and often humorous take on the world of advertising, public relations and social media. 100% Pure. Not from concentrate.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow