- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
Thanks, Sen. Allen et al.
Question of the Day
The Senate is close to meeting the military brain-injury challenge it nearly failed. Three weeks ago, lawmakers and the Pentagon drew fire for trying to halve the $14 million budget of the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, which treats soldiers returning from Iraq, by leaving $7 million out of this year’s defense appropriations bill. It made no sense to cut so critical a program, which costs less than 0.002 percent of the $468 billion bill. Thankfully, the cut is being corrected thanks to Sen. George Allen’s amendment this week.
Mr. Allen stepped up Tuesday with a measure to reverse the funding cut and add new money, increasing the center’s budget to $19 million. The measure passed by unanimous consent late Wednesday night. The bill is expected to reach the floor later this month.
We spoke this week with the co-founder of the Brain Injury Center, Dr. George Zitnay, who said that the $5 million net increase in funding will be used to hire more doctors and staffers, treat more soldiers and pay for a series of forward-looking research projects — including tissue engineering, drug research and studies on antibiotics and disorders of the central nervous system, and a look at potential injury prevention that already is in development. “It’s important to remember that with brain injury, the treatment doesn’t stop,” Dr. Zitnay said.
The bipartisan Allen amendment had a burgeoning list of cosponsors, including Sens. Dick Durbin, Ted Stevens and a host of Democrats, such as Hillary Clinton, John Kerry and Barack Obama.
Of course, no issue is above political mudslinging, so Mr. Allen’s challenger, James Webb, couldn’t resist slinging his share over a manufactured “Whose idea was it?” controversy. Mr. Webb’s campaign sent e-mails Tuesday and Wednesday claiming that Mr. Allen “stole” the idea from Mr. Durbin.
Note to Mr. Webb: This is precisely the type of unserious Washington infighting that turns the stomachs of ordinary voters. Even assuming that Mr. Webb’s allegation were true, so what? No one cares whose idea it was; voters only care that it gets done. How ironic that Mr. Webb, a combat-injured Vietnam veteran who fancies himself a political outsider, would get himself so entrapped in inside-the-Beltway politics.
A final observation: It’s remarkable that in an election year dominated by war and national security issues we would even need to pressure the Senate to fund the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center. This program should never, ever have fallen victim to routine budget cuts.
By David Keene
Allowing states to innovate could reduce dependency on bureaucracy
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Romney would win popular vote in rematch against Obama: CNN poll
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq