Week in Review

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

Humor in Iraq

I admit it. I lost my cool when a fellow editor told me that one of our foreign desk reporters was being savaged in a letter on a popular Web site. I grew even angrier when I saw what had been written and fired off an equally hostile reply.

I'm still upset about the tone of the letter, but it did raise questions that deserve to be discussed more calmly.

The letter writer was upset by reporter Sharon Behn's article on Monday's front page, in which she explained how the troops in Iraq use humor to maintain their sanity amid the everyday carnage of Iraq.

"We have been at war for more than five complete years. Thousands have died and hundreds of thousands have 'Seen the Elephant,' " the letter said. "Yet after all that time, and human experience, how does a piece of fluff with the title, 'Laughter, Best Medicine in Iraq,' appear on the FRONT PAGE, ABOVE THE FOLD, in an American newspaper?

"Excuse me, but are you kidding me? Even for The Washington Times, this must be marked as a pathetic low point."

There was more, some of it related to an egregious editing error in the story but some of it directed at an extremely conscientious reporter who has repeatedly faced grave risks during about 10 visits to Iraq.

"She has been unsparing in her description of the terrible toll the war has taken both on American troops and on the Iraqi people," I wrote in my reply. "How dare you impugn her because, after all of that, she tried to explain how the soldiers use jokes and horseplay to keep their sanity in the face of all that horror?"

So much for the exchange of insults. The legitimate issue here is how to achieve balance in our reporting when most of our stories are limited, for reasons of design and -- frankly -- the cost of newsprint, to 600 or 700 words?

Seeking balance