The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    HUTCHISON: Right must understand barriers to success

  • National

    WILLIAMS: Legislative malpractice practiced

  • Sports

    Redskins the ugliest show on Earth

  • Politics

    Obama: 'No faith justifies' Fort Hood rampage

  • National

    Michigan farm expert opens Marijuana U.

  • Politics

    Obama looks to avoid pitfalls in Asia

  • Politics

    Kennedy's disability plan could snag health bill

Home » Opinion » Editorials

Wednesday, August 8, 2007

Narcotics, Afghanistan and terrorists

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Editorials Stories

  • EDITORIAL: End Clinton-era military base gun ban
  • EDITORIAL: Delegate Norton's partisan public health policy
  • EDITORIAL: Vietnam myths haunt Afghanistan
  • EDITORIAL: All the president's lobbyists

By

If a narco-state can be defined as a nation where the production and export of illegal drugs comprises the equivalent of about 50 percent of that country's legitimate gross domestic product, then Afghanistan is a narco-state.

The numbers are staggering. According to the U.N. World Drug Report for 2007, which was issued in July, Afghanistan is home to 82 percent of the area throughout the world that is devoted to the cultivation of opium. Because Afghan poppies generate better yields than can be found elsewhere, the country was responsible for 92 percent of the opium produced in the world last year. The U.N. estimates that "around 92 percent of the world's heroin comes from poppies grown in Afghanistan." The 2007 World Drug Report revealed that "[t]here are indications that a small but increasing proportion of opiates from Afghanistan are being trafficked to North America." That means that Taliban-controlled areas in southern Afghanistan, where much of the recent increases in opium output have occurred, are effectively selling heroin to American addicts to finance their military operations against U.S. and allied forces.

In 2006, Afghan farmers produced 6,100 metric tons (a metric ton equals 2,200 pounds) of opium, while farmers throughout the rest of the world cumulatively harvested 510 metric tons. Ten years earlier, Afghanistan produced 2,248 metric tons of poppies, representing 52 percent of world output. As recently as 2001, when the then-governing Taliban had essentially eradicated opium production in Afghanistan, only 185 metric tons (11 percent of the world total) were produced there, according to the U.N. report. Since the U.S. military overthrew the Taliban during the fall of 2001 after Afghanistan-based al Qaeda attacked the United States on September 11, Afghan opium output, measured in metric tons, has increased to 3,400 (2002), 3,600 (2003), 4,200 (2004), 4,100 (2005) and 6,100 (2006).

As indicated above, opium production in Afghanistan increased 49 percent last year, rising from 4,100 metric tons in 2005 (when Afghan opium comprised 89 percent of the world's total) to 6,100 metric tons in 2006. In other words, while opium production declined by 10 metric tons in the rest of the world between 2005 and 2006, it increased by 2,000 tons in Afghanistan. That means that Afghanistan accounted for more than 100 percent of the worldwide increase in opium last year. Whereas Afghanistan is now producing more than three times the 1,980 metric tons of opium it harvested 15 years earlier, Myanmar is now producing less than one-fifth (315 metric tons) of its output in 1991 (1,728 metric tons). If Afghan opium output last year were at its 1991 level, world opium output would have been about a third of its actual level.

The area devoted to opium production in Afghanistan increased by nearly 60 percent last year, rising from 104,000 hectares to 165,000 hectares, its highest level ever. (A hectare equals 2.47 acres.) From 1991 through 2000, the Afghan area devoted to opium cultivation averaged 63,600 hectares, more than 100,000 fewer than last year's. Only six of Afghanistan's 34 provinces were free of opium production in 2006. In recent years, opium output has especially increased in Helmand province, where many Taliban fighters, no longer interested in eradicating opium, are located.

While total Afghan opium output increased by nearly 50 percent last year, prices "at the farm gate" fell by only 17 percent. Thus, total revenues soared for the 2.9 million Afghans involved in growing poppies. Moreover, because "Afghan opium is increasingly being processed into morphine and heroin within Afghanistan," the U.N. report estimates that the "total export value of opium to neighboring countries" totaled $3.1 billion last year, which was nearly half the size of Afghanistan's legal economy ($6.7 billion). "Gross trafficking profits to Afghan traffickers" totaled $2.34 billion, which buys a lot of AK-47s and the increasingly sophisticated improvised explosive devices that Afghan insurgents have been using in much greater numbers in recent months.

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Warner: Obama misplayed health care debate
  3. D.C. sniper executed in Virginia
  4. PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil
  5. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
More Top Stories »
  1. Families meet as sniper's execution nears
  2. Airport rules changed after Ron Paul aide detained
  3. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
  4. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies
  5. Court refuses to halt sniper's execution

Most Shared

  1. PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil
  2. Michigan farm expert opens Marijuana U.
  3. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  4. EDITORIAL: End Clinton-era military base gun ban
  5. Airport rules changed after Ron Paul aide detained
More Top Stories »
  1. EXCLUSIVE: Warner: Obama misplayed health care debate
  2. Kennedy's disability plan could snag health bill
  3. DeMint tries to ban 'permanent politicians'
  4. End of America's moment
  5. The siren call of Shariah

Most Commented

  1. PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil
  2. 'Fuzzy math' could drive health bill cost higher
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. Defense nominee won't reveal potential conflicts
  5. DeMint tries to ban 'permanent politicians'
More Top Stories »
  1. Obama: 'No faith justifies' Fort Hood rampage
  2. Kennedy's disability plan could snag health bill
  3. Jihadists in the military
  4. D.C. sniper executed in Virginia
  5. Airport rules changed after Ron Paul aide detained

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    New Vatican constitution released

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    Horton placed on IR

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.