- FAA’s pre-Malaysia flight warning: 777s have cracking, corrosion issues
- Facebook HQ locked down; employees searched as police field threat
- Glenn Ford free, after serving 30 years for murder he didn’t commit
- Congressman: McAuliffe victory means gun control a winning message
- Clinton aide admits soliciting disgraced D.C. fundraiser; says actions were legal
- Joel Osteen church victimized in $600K theft
- Obama goes shopping at Gap as minimum-wage thanks
- N.J. woman charged after client dies from black-market butt injections
- CIA chief Brennan ‘determined’ to speak out more this year
- Reset? What reset? U.S.-Russia ties at worst since Cold War
India says nuke tests OK
NEW DELHI (AP) India is free to test nuclear weapons under a much-touted nuclear deal with the United States, the country’s prime minister said today as lawmakers opposed to the pact noisily demanded the agreement be scrapped.
The civilian nuclear cooperation deal reverses three decades of American policy by allowing the U.S. to send nuclear fuel and technology to India, which has never signed major international nonproliferation accords and has tested atomic weapons in the past.
Since it was first announced in July 2005, the agreement has been praised as a cornerstone of an emerging partnership between India and the United States after decades on opposite sides of the Cold War divide. But it has also drawn criticism in both countries.
In India, many critics simply oppose closer ties with the United States, arguing that the pact could allow Washington to dictate foreign policy to New Delhi and undermine the country’s cherished nuclear weapons program.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh insisted that was not the case in a speech to lawmakers today. The deal, he said, is “another step in our journey to regain our due place in global councils.”
As for fears it could stymie the weapons program, which does not fall under the scope of the pact, Singh said: “This agreement does not in any way inhibit, restrict or curtail our strategic autonomy or capabilities.”
While India retained the right “to undertake future nuclear tests if it is necessary in India’s national interest,” the country nonetheless remained committed to its unilateral moratorium on tests, put in place after New Delhi detonated a weapon in 1998, he added.
As he spoke, lawmakers from the Hindu nationalist opposition and from communist parties that support Singh but oppose the deal sought to drown out the prime minister, shouting, “cancel the nuclear deal!”
Similar protests by lawmakers earlier in the day forced the house to adjourn until Singh spoke in the afternoon.
India got nearly everything it wanted in the 1-2-3 agreement, including the right to stockpile and reprocess atomic fuel.
The deal also does not contain a test ban, and some clauses have been interpreted to mean that an Indian test would not automatically scuttle the deal if the move followed tests by either Pakistan or China, India’s major rivals.
But Congress last year included a test ban when it created an exception for India to American laws that prohibit civilian nuclear cooperation with countries that have not signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.
That law, which was needed before the technical agreement could be worked out, has been seized on by Indian opponents as evidence that the U.S. is seeking to constrain the South Asian country’s long-standing weapons program.
Although the Hindu nationalists have no chance of the defeating the deal, which does not need to be approved by Parliament, Singh’s coalition government needs the communists for its parliamentary majority.
An America drowning in red ink is the land of the free no more
- Inside the Beltway: A new interest in Rahm Emanuel for 2016?
- David Jolly wins in Florida, GOP keeps swing district seat
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- HURT: John Kerry The ridiculous face of a ridiculous U.S. diplomacy
- Brennan: Russia 'absolutely' could invade eastern Ukraine
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- LOZANSKY: World War III over Ukraine, anyone?
- 80 people publicly executed across North Korea for films, Bibles
- CARNES: Kissinger's flawed and offensive analysis of Ukraine
- Minister sees breakthrough 'in months' for long-split Cyprus
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again