- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Nuke deal defended to wary lawmakers
Question of the Day
NEW DELHI (AP) — India is free to keep developing and testing nuclear weapons under its much-touted atomic cooperation pact with the United States, the country’s prime minister said yesterday, defending the deal in front of lawmakers who noisily demanded it be scrapped.
Indian and U.S. leaders say the deal will cement a strategic partnership between the world’s two largest democracies after decades spent on opposite sides of the Cold War divide.
Critics of the deal in both countries have seized on India’s right to push ahead with its cherished weapons program and, if needed, test atomic bombs.
The pact reverses three decades of U.S. policy by allowing the United States to send atomic fuel and technology to India, which has never signed international nonproliferation accords and has tested atomic weapons.
Indian critics argue that the pact could result in too much U.S. influence over their country’s foreign policy and undermine its weapons program.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh insisted that was not the case in a speech to lawmakers yesterday. The deal, he said, is “another step in our journey to regain our due place in global councils.”
He also touted the benefits of the deal for India’s booming but energy-starved economy.
As for fears it could stymie the weapons program, Mr. Singh said, “This agreement does not in any way inhibit, restrict or curtail our strategic autonomy or capabilities.”
Although India retained the right “to undertake future nuclear tests if it is necessary in India’s national interest,” the country nonetheless remained committed to its unilateral moratorium on tests, put in place after New Delhi detonated a weapon in 1998, he added.
As he spoke, lawmakers from the Hindu nationalist opposition and from communist parties that support Mr. Singh but oppose the deal sought to drown out the prime minister, shouting, “We don’t want to be American stooges” and “Cancel the nuclear deal.”
Similar protests by lawmakers earlier in the day forced the house to adjourn until Mr. Singh spoke in the afternoon.
The Hindu nationalists have no chance of defeating the deal, which does not need to be approved by Parliament.
Mr. Singh gave his speech after diplomats sealed a technical pact, known as the 1-2-3 agreement, which details how nuclear cooperation between New Delhi and Washington is to work.
India got nearly everything it wanted, including the right to stockpile and reprocess nuclear fuel, a key step in making weapons.
By Steve King
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- U.S. evacuates embassy in Libya amid violent clashes between militias
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Obama: U.S. should 'embrace an economic patriotism that says we rise or fall together'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- EDITORIAL: Obama's 'economic patriotism' means higher taxes
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq