- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
Judge to rule on driving-fees challenge
A judge in Henrico County, Va., today is expected to rule on what appears to be the first legal challenge against a state that imposes stiff driving fees solely on its residents.
Attorneys representing Anthony O. Price, convicted last week of driving on a suspended license for the fifth time in Virginia, argue the state’s new fee program is unconstitutional because an out-of-state driver would be immune to the additional $750 Mr. Price now faces.
According to officials in four other states with similar laws, there has never been an equal-protection challenge against singling out in-state drivers. Only Texas imposes the fees solely on in-state drivers, and only Michigan has faced a constitutional fight.
In March, the Michigan Court of Appeals said the state’s Driver Responsibility Law (DRL) “is rationally related to the legitimate government purpose of generating revenue from individuals who impose costs on government and society. We hold that the DRL does not, on its face, deprive plaintiffs of the equal protection of the law.”
The ruling is almost identical to the wording of Virginia’s “civil remedial fee” statute, which states the purpose of the fees is “to generate revenue from drivers whose proven dangerous driving behavior places significant financial burdens upon the Commonwealth.”
The two cases can’t be compared, officials said.
“If that [in-state only] distinction was not there [In the Virginia law] … I don’t know that the equal-protection argument would be there,” Ms. Windmueller said.
Sen. Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II, Fairfax County Republican and a critic of the fees, said he thinks the equal protection argument is “legitimate.”
“The big question I think is [does the judge] accept the notion that the fees are separate from the criminal punishment or not,” Mr. Cuccinelli said. “If the judge decides and goes with case law that says if you get a conviction you pay these fees, then the fees are part of the punishment, and then the equal-protection argument will have legs.”
House Democratic Caucus Chairman Brian J. Moran, a critic of the fees, said there is some validity that Virginians are being treated unfairly. “There is probably not a lot of case law because it is unusual for a state to put a tax on itself as opposed to out-of-staters,” he said.
Today’s ruling could trigger a series of appeals that could push the case toward the state Supreme Court.
The fees are tucked into the multibillion-dollar transportation package the Republican-controlled General Assembly and Gov. Timothy M. Kaine, a Democrat, carved out earlier this year.
The package, which relies on long-term borrowing and an assortment of regional taxes and fees in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads, was celebrated as “landmark legislation” and the end to infighting between the centrists and anti-tax wing of the Republican Party.
Statewide, Virginians are bashing the fees, which range from $750 for driving with a suspended license to $3,000 for a driving-related felony.
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- House pushes through two-year Ryan-Murray budget deal
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.
An informed and often humorous take on the world of advertising, public relations and social media. 100% Pure. Not from concentrate.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow