- Obama encourages ICE to stand down, say former border agents
- Pro-Palestinian protesters attack Israeli soccer team in Austria match
- Virginia police: 2 dead after storm at campground
- Ukrainian prime minister announces resignation
- House members question $17 billion VA request
- N.Y. Gov. Cuomo launches statewide task force to collect LGBT data
- Obama’s motorcade prevents woman in labor from crossing street to hospital
- Grijalva: Anti-trafficking law ‘line in the sand for many of us’
- Joe Biden: ‘Businesses are hiring at historic rates’
- Jeb Bush to Congress: Don’t use border crisis as excuse to delay immigration reform
Judge to rule on driving-fees challenge
Question of the Day
A judge in Henrico County, Va., today is expected to rule on what appears to be the first legal challenge against a state that imposes stiff driving fees solely on its residents.
Attorneys representing Anthony O. Price, convicted last week of driving on a suspended license for the fifth time in Virginia, argue the state’s new fee program is unconstitutional because an out-of-state driver would be immune to the additional $750 Mr. Price now faces.
“Our equal protection argument is based on the different penalties imposed on in-state and out-of-state drivers,” said Esther J. Windmueller, an attorney representing Mr. Price.
According to officials in four other states with similar laws, there has never been an equal-protection challenge against singling out in-state drivers. Only Texas imposes the fees solely on in-state drivers, and only Michigan has faced a constitutional fight.
In March, the Michigan Court of Appeals said the state’s Driver Responsibility Law (DRL) “is rationally related to the legitimate government purpose of generating revenue from individuals who impose costs on government and society. We hold that the DRL does not, on its face, deprive plaintiffs of the equal protection of the law.”
The ruling is almost identical to the wording of Virginia’s “civil remedial fee” statute, which states the purpose of the fees is “to generate revenue from drivers whose proven dangerous driving behavior places significant financial burdens upon the Commonwealth.”
The two cases can’t be compared, officials said.
“If that [in-state only] distinction was not there [In the Virginia law] … I don’t know that the equal-protection argument would be there,” Ms. Windmueller said.
Sen. Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II, Fairfax County Republican and a critic of the fees, said he thinks the equal protection argument is “legitimate.”
“The big question I think is [does the judge] accept the notion that the fees are separate from the criminal punishment or not,” Mr. Cuccinelli said. “If the judge decides and goes with case law that says if you get a conviction you pay these fees, then the fees are part of the punishment, and then the equal-protection argument will have legs.”
House Democratic Caucus Chairman Brian J. Moran, a critic of the fees, said there is some validity that Virginians are being treated unfairly. “There is probably not a lot of case law because it is unusual for a state to put a tax on itself as opposed to out-of-staters,” he said.
Today’s ruling could trigger a series of appeals that could push the case toward the state Supreme Court.
The fees are tucked into the multibillion-dollar transportation package the Republican-controlled General Assembly and Gov. Timothy M. Kaine, a Democrat, carved out earlier this year.
The package, which relies on long-term borrowing and an assortment of regional taxes and fees in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads, was celebrated as “landmark legislation” and the end to infighting between the centrists and anti-tax wing of the Republican Party.
Statewide, Virginians are bashing the fees, which range from $750 for driving with a suspended license to $3,000 for a driving-related felony.
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Obama's empty tough-talk: Gun prosecutions plummet on his watch
- Algerian plane diverted due to storms, second aircraft: 116 missing
- Whistleblowers flood VA with lawsuits despite apology
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Obama says public not familiar enough with issues
- Obama dispatches researchers to border to check on National Guard
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Astronaut shares 'saddest photo' from space: Bombs bursting over Israel, Gaza
- Conservative groups decry Democrats' 'war on women' tactic
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq