Around the world, a handful of scientists are trying to create life from scratch and they are getting closer, expecting an announcement within three to 10 years from someone in the now little-known field of “wet artificial life.”
“It’s going to be a big deal and everybody’s going to know about it,” said Mark Bedau, chief operating officer of ProtoLife of Venice, Italy, one of those in the race. “We’re talking about a technology that could change our world in pretty fundamental ways — in fact, in ways that are impossible to predict.”
That first cell of synthetic life — made from the basic chemicals in DNA — may not seem like much to non-scientists. For one thing, one must look into a microscope to see it.
“Creating protocells has the potential to shed new life on our place in the universe,” Mr. Bedau said. “This will remove one of the few fundamental mysteries about creation in the universe and our role.”
Several scientists think man-made life forms will one day offer the potential for solving a variety of problems, from fighting diseases to locking up greenhouse gases to eating toxic waste. Mr. Bedau figures there are three major hurdles to creating synthetic life:
c A container, or membrane, for the cell to keep out bad molecules, allow good ones, and have the ability to multiply.
c A genetic system that controls the functions of the cell, enabling it to reproduce and mutate in response to environmental changes.
c A metabolism that extracts raw materials from the environment as food and then changes it into energy.
One of the leaders in the field, Jack Szostak at Harvard Medical School, predicts that within the next six months, scientists will report evidence that the first step — creating a cell membrane — is “not a big problem.” Scientists are using fatty acids in that effort. Mr. Szostak is also optimistic about the next step, getting nucleotides, the building blocks of DNA, to form a working genetic system.
His idea is that once the container is made, if scientists add nucleotides in the right proportions, then evolution could simply take over.
“We aren’t smart enough to design things; we just let evolution do the hard work and then we figure out what happened,” Mr. Szostak said.
In Gainesville, Fla., Steve Benner, a biological chemist at the Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution, is attacking that problem by going outside of natural genetics. Normal DNA consists of four bases adenine, cytosine, guanine and thymine (known as A,C,G,T) molecules that spell out the genetic code in pairs. Mr. Benner is trying to add eight new bases to the genetic alphabet.
Mr. Bedau said there are legitimate worries about creating life that could “run amok,” a common moral criticism of creating life since Mary Shelley’s novel “Frankenstein.”
But he said that would not be a problem for a long time.View Entire Story
By Andrew P. Napolitano
The president's men trash the Constitution to pursue antagonists
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
Opinion, analysis, and musings on politics, pop culture, reinvention, and the resultant flotsam and jetsam floating around the right-of-center quadrant of the Left Coast.
Consummate traveler Todd DeFeo explores the unique stories that make destinations worth going to.
We welcome you to the intimate and personal thoughts on the news and events we, as editors, watch, read, and discuss with our writers every day.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention