- Sen. Rand Paul: ‘I am seriously thinking about’ running for president in 2016
- Sleet, ice, deepfreeze hit large swath of U.S.
- ‘Welcome to the edge of freedom’: Biden’s boots touch down in DMZ
- Obama: Hole U.S. ‘digging out of’ requires billions more in unemployment benefits
- Obama’s regulatory agenda will cost U.S. economy $143B next year: report
- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
The Bush White House and the Democratic Congress have been on a collision course over fiscal policy ever since the president released his fiscal 2008 budget in February calling for annual reductions in nominal non-security discretionary spending.
From an estimated level of $458 billion for fiscal 2007, which ends Sept. 30, the White House’s five-year budget blueprint planned to reduce nominal non-security discretionary outlays to $456 billion in 2008, $439 billion in 2010 and $435 billion in 2012. But Democrats do not consider their victories in last year's elections to be mandates from their base to relentlessly cut non-security discretionary spending.
In May, as the Democratic conferees from the House and Senate were negotiating the ceilings for discretionary spending for each of the 12 yearly appropriation bills, the White House issued a letter threatening to veto any spending measure that exceeded the outlays proposed in the president’s budget. The congressional budget resolution that emerged from the conference committee established non-security discretionary spending levels that cumulatively exceeded the president’s requests by $23 billion.
While the congressional budget resolution was not subject to presidential approval or veto, each forthcoming spending bill will be. President Bush, who never vetoed a spending measure during his first six years, is determined to regain the confidence of the Republican base, which became disgusted by the spending habits of Republican-dominated Washington from 2001 through last year. Congressional Republicans, including the 147 GOP House members (one more than the number needed to sustain a veto) who signed a letter to the president promising to join him in enforcing fiscal discipline, are also determined to regain their reputation for fiscal probity on spending matters.
There’s good reason for the pervasive disgust over spending throughout the Republican base. Inflation-adjusted total federal spending will have increased by 27 percent (more than 4 percent annually) over the six fiscal years ending with 2007. Over the same period, the economy has increased by less than 2.7 percent per year. Thus, spending has been growing nearly 50 percent faster than the economy. Meanwhile, inflation-adjusted revenues will have increased by an average of only 1.3 percent per year, which is half the rate of economic growth during the last six fiscal years. Soaring budget deficits were the result.
With federal spending projected to exceed $2.9 trillion in 2008, skeptics argue that the rapidly approaching veto-filled fight over $23 billion in non-security spending amounts to waging a war over less than eight-tenths of 1 percent of total spending. It’s true that $23 billion represents the cost of fighting the war in Iraq for about two months; and $23 billion amounts to less than 5 percent of the $470 billion in interest expenses that will be paid on the federal debt next year. But if Republicans believe in reducing the size of government, the fight over $23 billion will at least be a beginning.
- Obama: Hole U.S. 'digging out of' requires billions more in unemployment benefits
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Obama tries to calm Israeli fears over Iranian nuke deal 'not based on trust'
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality
- Obamas call to close Vatican embassy is 'slap in the face' to Roman Catholics
- Craigslist killers: Police say newlyweds stabbed man for thrills
- Dick Cheney: Family feud over gay marriage has been 'dealt with'
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Get in the middle of all the action inside and outside the boxing ring.
Opinion, analysis, and musings on politics, pop culture, reinvention, and the resultant flotsam and jetsam floating around the right-of-center quadrant of the Left Coast.
The cold hard truth about politics in America today and the state of this once great nation.
Find the latest news and happening that effect those in the Washington D.C., Northern Virginia and Maryland Metro region.
White House pets gone wild!