- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
New York gets camera-shy
Question of the Day
Filmmakers, photographers and civil liberties advocates are protesting proposed rules that would require permits and $1 million insurance policies for people trying to film or take pictures in one of the world’s most photographed cities.
Regulations drafted by the Mayor's Office of Film, Theatre and Broadcasting would require a permit for any type of filming or photography that involved “an interaction among two or more people at a single site for 30 or more minutes.”
Permits also would be required for five or more persons using a tripod for more than 10 minutes.
The rules would be nothing new for professional crews that film regularly in the city; they have long been required to obtain permits and insurance to block off streets and sidewalks.
Critics say the proposed rules would affect a new class of shooters: fashion and wedding photographers, independent journalists conducting street interviews, and amateurs making videos to post online.
The New York Civil Liberties Union is prepared to take action against the regulations in court if they are enacted without revision, said one of the organization’s attorneys, Christopher Dunn.
“There is no way that they should be requiring permits for people using hand-held cameras,” Mr. Dunn said. “It would give the police license to stop virtually anyone, and that opens the door to harassment.”
Documentary filmmaker Jennifer Livingston called the proposal “draconian,” and a betrayal of the city’s long history of nurturing budding talent.
“Think of that young artist who is going to be hurried along by some cop, who has no choice but to follow regulations,” she said. “I would hate to see film students thinking that any time they make an image, it has to be sanctioned by the government.”
City officials insist the rules aren’t an attempt to quash free speech.
People unable to afford liability insurance, which could cost $500 to $1,000 for even the smallest of photo shoots, could apply to the city for a waiver.
Reporters with a press pass issued by the police department would be exempt. So would anyone using hand-held equipment to film a parade, rally or political demonstration.
Julianne Cho, associate commissioner of the film office, said the city’s only intention was to help filmmakers get safe access to great locations, while ensuring production didn’t obstruct traffic or interfere with New Yorkers’ lives.
The city is accepting public comment on the proposed rules until today and still could make changes.
By David Keene
Allowing states to innovate could reduce dependency on bureaucracy
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Romney would win popular vote in rematch against Obama: CNN poll
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq