- Harvard student to face federal charges for bomb hoax
- Ronnie Biggs of ‘Great Train Robbery’ fame dies, 84
- Pope Francis wins another ‘Person of the Year’ — from gay rights magazine
- Rep. Steve Stockman: Give my campaign $10, and you’ll get an Obama barf bag
- Putin: Russia to buy $15 billion in Ukraine bonds
- Expert: Obamacare ‘death spiral’ fears exaggerated
- Alabama firefighters dig for survivors of apartment blast
- Big Sur wildfire destroys home of firefighting chief
- ‘ ’Twas the Night Before Christmas’ set for mock trial to argue authorship
- Angela Merkel’s third term as Germany’s chancellor to be marked by move to left
India’s nuclear bargain blocked
NEW DELHI — Communist Party leaders say they are trying to keep U.S. influence at bay and protect India’s poor from ruthless foreign enterprises by blocking a deal on nuclear energy with the United States.
Critics of the Communists put it a little differently, arguing that they are engaging in political obstructionism in hopes of developing closer ties with China — at the expense of the same rural underclass they claim to represent.
The Communists, with enough seats in Parliament to force an election at any time, have staunchly rejected the deal — which would allow India to buy U.S. nuclear energy technology without giving up its weapons program — ever since it was signed in July 2005 by President Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
They describe it as an affront to Indian sovereignty that gives the United States too much power over foreign-policy matters.
“To make India’s foreign policy and strategic autonomy hostage to the potential of nuclear energy does not make sense,” Communist Party of India (Marxist) General Secretary Prakash Karat has written, “except for the American imperative to bind India to its strategic designs in Asia.”
Aside from a heavy-handed grip on power for the past 30 years in West Bengal state, the four Communist parties making up the left wing of Indian politics have remained at the fringe of national politics — until recently.
The Communists agreed to join a 16-party coalition formed by Congress but refused to accept a Cabinet seat — a tactical decision that has given them the leverage to fold the government at any time.
This includes the assurance of nuclear technologies and reactor fuel for the energy-starved country in exchange for New Delhi’s pledge to separate civilian and nuclear facilities and call a moratorium on nuclear testing.
More important, the deal would help India to boost its output of electricity in order to sustain its breakneck economic growth — second only to China’s over the past 15 years. Mr. Singh thinks the nuclear deal would boost India’s nuclear power production from 3 percent to 10 percent of total energy production by 2020.
The Communists have offered no alternative plan to meet energy requirements, instead making known their plans to scale back commercial activity and undo reforms that have gradually integrated India into the global economy.
In October, he said the main problem with the nuclear deal is that it is part of a U.S. plan to “encircle” China. Last month, he praised China as “the most powerful socialist country capable of challenging the might of the United States.”
Leftist obstructionism of the nuclear deal was recently undercut by a series of ugly events in West Bengal state, a longtime Communist Party stronghold, in which members of the rural underclass were victimized.
Communist leaders in the state had set up Special Economic Zones, inspired by the Chinese model, to attract business interests after heavily pro-labor policies stalled the economy, but farmers refused to vacate lands designated for the project.
In March, the state government sent armed thugs and police to attack protesters in the village of Nandigram, where a chemical complex was to be built, leaving 14 persons dead.
When protests resumed last month, a second wave of attacks was ordered in which six persons were killed and almost 5,000 were displaced. A wave of anger swept across the country when party leaders declared the violence was “morally and legally” justified.
By John R. Bolton
The president fiddles at his domestic altar while the world burns
- PRUDEN: The scam that will not die
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- Top Democrats reject court ruling over NSA spying on Americans
- Zadzooks: The Joker sixth scale figure review (Sideshow Collectibles)
- Embassy Row: India strikes back over diplomat's arrest
- Domino's launches its first vegan pizza
- Army to cut up to 4,000 captains and majors
- Minister: Iceland refused to help FBI on WikiLeaks
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Uncensored exploration of issues concerning current events, civil liberties, American political advocacy, and the political and social issues facing military veterans.
NFL junkie Eric Golub reports on his favorite obsession. There is no football offseason. Every February he pretends to care about other sports while sobbing uncontrollably each Sunday until September.
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up by Lisa King Dolloff and friends.
Wall Street news for retail investors who want to know what's going on.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow