Intellect and Jasper Johns

Question of the Day

What has been the biggest debacle on Obama's watch?

View results

Can purely intellectual painting be significant in the history of art? That’s the intriguing question posed by the National Gallery of Art’s “Jasper Johns: An Allegory of Painting, 1955-1965.”

It was during those years that Mr. Johns created four of his most important motifs: the target; what exhibit curator Jeffrey Weiss calls “the device” (for example, a pivoted slat used to scrape paint); the stenciled identification of colors; and the cast or imprint of the body.

With these potent motifs, he radically overthrew previous art conventions. Mr. Johns, who was born in 1930, rejected the sweeping, oversized canvases of the 1940s and 1950s by abstract expressionists such as Jackson Pollock and Willem de Kooning.

Mr. Johns, however, refused to align himself with other groups of artists or to be categorized in any way.

Instead, he created a set of iconic signs he used singly, such as “Target” (1958), or in different combinations, such as “Target With Four Faces” (1955). With them, he sought to create a different kind of art, one dependent on obsessive delving into the history of art, as well as technical virtuosity.

As the exhibit brochure attempts to explain: “The target, a banded image drawn with a compass, is replaced by the compass itself, which is left attached to the canvas, where it is used to inscribe or scrape a circle.”

In other words, the compass (in Mr. Johns’ case, a slat of wood) becomes the “device” that is rotated to inscribe the circle. The methodology becomes part of the art’s overall aesthetic.

This is all well and good if art is viewed as a shuffling of cards or the rearranging of puzzle pieces, as the interactions of these motifs imply.

But art is more than an intellectual exercise, although Mr. Johns’ “False Start” (1959) sold for $80 million in October, according to Agence France-Presse.

It’s fashionable to ooh-and-aah over his work — especially that in the exhibition — but viewers may long for more dollops of emotion and sensuality.

Consider the exhibit’s 27 “targets,” created from 1955 through 1960. Revealing the artist’s technical prowess, they’re among his most challenging and ambiguous images.

The group begins with two of his most iconic works, “Target With Plaster Casts” (1955) (encaustic and collage on canvas with painted plaster casts) and “Target With Four Faces” (encaustic on newspaper and cloth over canvas surmounted by four tinted-plaster faces in a wood box with hinged front).

They show his love of paradox — the two targets are symbolically similar but also radically different — and demonstrate the artist’s effective use of unusual materials. Both targets imply the opposites of aesthetics and physicality, as once the targets are painted, their original use as objects and signs are nullified.

When Mr. Johns painted the exhibit’s smaller targets of different materials, sizes and colors (unfortunately, the materials aren’t identified in the brochure or catalog), he obviously reveled in what he could paint and draw.

The wall label states that he once asked, “What forms of art making were still viable in an era when conventional practices of art had been thrown into doubt?” These certainly are among them.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus