- Al Gore’s climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
- Army’s 3-D printed bombs will create ‘a whole new universe’ of deadly capabilities
- Hamas calls on Hezbollah to join in fight against Israel
- Senators to FIFA, others: Don’t reward Putin with the World Cup in 2018
- U.S. condemns Israeli shelling of shelter in Gaza
- Obamacare shoots premiums up by 88 percent in California
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- Obama to Republicans: ‘Stop just hatin’ all the time’
- U.S. chemical sites vulnerable despite millions spent on security: Congress
- Driverless cars to hit the British streets by 2015
Altar’s banned brass cross presides over debate
Question of the Day
WILLIAMSBURG — A simple brass cross was returned to the altar of the College of William & Mary’s Wren Chapel Thursday night during a debate over whether school President Gene Nichol was right to order its removal.
Mr. Nichol justified his October decision as an attempt to make the chapel more open to people of all faiths. The 18-inch table cross didn’t keep supporters and detractors alike from packing the 120-seat chapel for the debate between conservative author Dinesh D’Souza and William & Mary religion professor David Holmes.
Previously, the cross could be removed at any time by request; now, it can be returned by request.
Mr. D’Souza argued that Mr. Nichol acted “recklessly.”
Mr. Nichol later responded to criticism by returning the cross on Sundays, but more than 10,000 people signed an online petition to put the cross back permanently.
“Why is Christianity being singled out for special exclusion?” asked Mr. D’Souza, whose books include “Letters to a Young Conservative” and “The Enemy at Home: The Cultural Left and Its Responsibility for 9/11.”
He contended Mr. Nichol was wrongly “driven by this idea that Christianity and its symbols are in some way offensive.”
Mr. Holmes noted that the chapel, built as an Anglican place of worship in 1732, did not even have a cross until about 1940.
Protestants, concerned about idolatry, used to be averse to having crosses in church, he said. The cross was transferred to the chapel while a local church was being renovated and has remained at the school.
“I am baffled to hear critics insist the altar has to have a cross,” said Mr. Holmes, who specializes in subjects including American religious history and architecture and worship.
Mr. D’Souza argued that the issue is not about historic authenticity.
The cross, he said, fits with William & Mary’s Christian heritage. The school was chartered in 1693 as an Anglican institution with a mission that included training ministers.
He also said Mr. Nichol had no right to act unilaterally, without consulting the broader college community, including students, parents, faculty and alumni.
Mr. Holmes pointed out that last week Mr. Nichol announced the creation of a committee that will study the issue, though he said he would be surprised if the committee were to recommend that the cross be displayed permanently, given the increasingly diverse religious backgrounds of the student body.
Mr. Holmes also said William & Mary has been a public school since 1906 and the chapel is used for a wide variety of secular events and religious services.
- Geraldo Rivera: Matt Drudge 'doing his best to stir up a civil war'
- Lois Lerner hated conservatives, new emails show
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- HURT: Impeaching Obama is a losing strategy for the GOP
- CARSON: Rudderless U.S. foreign policy
- Patent workers paid to exercise, shop, do chores: report
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- Fla. mom arrested for allowing 7-year-old son to walk to park alone
- Senate overcomes first filibuster of Obama's border-spending bill
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world