


RICHMOND — A Republican-written transportation package passed the General Assemblyyesterday, narrowly winning passage in a pivotal Senate vote and overwhelmingly in the House in the 2007 General Assembly’s final hours.
The Senate approved the conference report and the $2.5 billion in borrowing it authorizes by 2016 on a 21-18 vote.
Earlier, the House passed the measure 64-34.
The Senate vote on the legislative session’s dominant issue was decisive, sending Gov. Timothy M. Kaine a roads, rails and transit package that he said has “huge problems” and faces “significant surgery.”
It was a pivotal political moment for many senators, who face voters in heavily populated Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads restive over chronic highway gridlock and commutes that stretch into hours daily.
The measure survived the Senate despite solid opposition by minority Democrats. Though all 21 votes for the measure were from Republicans, some of them spoke derisively of it even as they urged its passage, hoping Mr. Kaine’s amendments would dramatically improve it.
“It’s so bad, it’s so perverted that we probably just ought to vote [for] it to get it out of here in hopes that somebody can fix it later,” said Sen. John Watkins, Powhatan Republican, who voted for it.
“I think it will die on its own because it’s inoperable,” he said.
Sen. Thomas K. Norment, the Senate patron, also urged his colleagues to leave the legislation for Mr. Kaine to amend and improve “like a fine cosmetic surgeon.”
Critics in the House and Senate argued that the $2.5 billion in bonds the bill authorizes for statewide transportation projects does too little to address a backlog of transportation projects that exceeds $100 billion.
“What we have before us is, at best, a very, very temporary measure,” said Delegate Vivian E. Watts, who was the state’s transportation secretary in the late 1980s.
“If this passes, please don’t lie to the voters that we have in any way fixed this problem,” said Mrs. Watts, Fairfax Democrat.
Retiring Sen. H. Russell Potts Jr., Winchester Republican, called the plan “a miserable Band-Aid” and gleefully ridiculed anti-tax conservatives for supporting it, particularly regional packages for Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads that will take millions of dollars more from Virginians under the guise of fees, not taxes.
“Let’s talk about this no-tax pledge they’ve signed. Here we are: Proposed sources — a local rental-car impact fee. Not a tax but a fee,” Mr. Potts sneered, drawing out the word fee as he turned and stared at conservatives he was targeting.
The report’s dominant funding feature is $2.5 billion in bonds to be issued through 2016. That’s $500 million more than the debt the earlier House-backed plan contemplated.
View Entire StoryBy H. Leighton Steward
Fantasy replaces reality in Obama's green economy

By Luke Rosiak - The Washington Times
When Newt Gingrich’s campaign disclosed in October it planned to pay the candidate $70,000 for ...

By David Hill - The Washington Times
The House voted Friday night to approve Gov. Martin O’Malley’s same-sex marriage bill, sending the ...

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times
Acting with striking bipartisanship, Congress on Friday passed a full-year extension of the payroll tax ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

Not your typical discussion, writer Conor Murphy writes about the cons, and pros, of politics

Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.

How does our 50th state view D.C. politics?