- The Washington Times - Sunday, January 14, 2007

ATLANTA (AP) — Prosecutors say a former Coca-Cola secretary took confidential documents from the beverage giant and samples of products that hadn’t been marketed with the aim of selling them to rival Pepsi. Her attorney says she was duped by two ex-cons and didn’t commit a crime.

A jury will be asked to determine who is telling the truth. The process of selecting that jury starts tomorrow in Joya Williams’ trial.

Miss Williams, who was fired as an administrative assistant to the Coca-Cola Co.’s global brand director after the reputed scheme came to light last summer, faces up to 10 years in prison if convicted of conspiracy.

Miss Williams, Edmund Duhaney and Ibrahim Dimson were indicted on the single federal charge, accused of stealing new product samples and confidential documents from Atlanta-based Coca-Cola and trying to sell them to Purchase, N.Y.-based Pepsico Inc.

The reputed plans were foiled after Pepsi warned Coca-Cola in May and an undercover FBI investigation was begun.

Dimson and Duhaney have pleaded guilty and are awaiting sentencing. Duhaney is expected to testify against Miss Williams, though it is not clear whether Dimson will.

The two men served prison terms at the same time at a federal penitentiary in Montgomery, Ala. Duhaney served nearly five years of a seven-year sentence on a cocaine charge before being released in 2005; Dimson served less than one year of a two-year sentence on a bank fraud charge before his release in 2004.

Miss Williams’ attorney, Janice Singer, said she plans to make the two men’s credibility a key issue in her client’s defense. Miss Williams does not have a criminal record, another lawyer who previously represented her has said.

“The case is about two felons who manipulated and used my client without her knowledge,” Miss Singer said. “She did not take any documents she believed to be trade secrets to share with these people or to harm Coke and benefit Pepsi, nor did she intentionally knowingly give them any documents.”

Miss Singer said that Miss Williams was allowed to take home documents from her job. She suggested that Dimson and Duhaney stole the materials from her.

“We’re not denying that she possessed them, but we are denying that she conspired with the other defendants to do anything nefarious or wrong,” Miss Singer said.

However, prosecutors say they have a strong case. That includes video surveillance showing Miss Williams at her desk at Coke headquarters going through multiple files looking for documents and stuffing them into bags, according to court records. She also was observed holding a liquid container with a white label, which resembled the description of a new product sample, before placing it into her personal bag, prosecutors say.

The prosecution says a box containing two undisclosed product samples and other confidential company papers were found in Duhaney’s home during a search on July 5, the day all three were arrested.

Coke has declined to give details about the samples, including the products for which they were used. The indictment only refers to a mysterious “Project N ….”

Duhaney’s attorney, Don Samuel, said his client played a small role in the scheme. “He pleaded guilty to being a member of a conspiracy so you can assume he will testify consistent to that plea,” Mr. Samuel said.

The episode prompted Coke to re-evaluate its safeguards for protecting trade secrets.

The products involved weren’t locked up in a bank vault like the recipe for Coca-Cola’s flagship soda brand.

LOAD COMMENTS ()

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide