- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
Senate passes ethics reform by 96-2 margin
Question of the Day
The Senate last night overwhelmingly passed an ethics bill after breaking a day-long stalemate over a Republican proposal on earmarks that had threatened to kill the legislation.
The vote was 96-2, with the two “no” votes coming from Republican Sens. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma and Orrin G. Hatch of Utah.
“It’s the most significant legislation on ethics and lobbying reform ever passed in the history of the country, and it was hard to get there,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said as he left the Senate chamber after last night’s vote. “It was a long day.”
The impasse had centered on an amendment by Sen. Judd Gregg, New Hampshire Republican, that would authorize the president to remove earmarks — provisions in a bill to fund specific projects, often used by members of Congress to pay for pet projects in their home districts or states — and send the legislation back to Congress for a second look and another vote.
Republicans wanted to vote on their amendment as part of the ethics bill, but Sen. Robert C. Byrd, West Virginia Democrat, had been single-handedly blocking a deal.
“This reform bill is threatened by an effort by our colleagues on the other side of the aisle to give the president line-item veto authority,” Mr. Byrd said on the Senate floor yesterday. When Republicans didn’t get the amendment vote they wanted, they retaliated Wednesday by voting against a parliamentary procedure needed to pass the overall ethics bill, effectively blocking what had been Mr. Reid’s first order of business.
But Mr. Reid, Nevada Democrat, secured the ethics-bill vote last night by conceding to Republican demands for a vote on the Gregg amendment.
“It was a difficult bump,” Mr. Reid said. Still, he said he was “proud of this debate. It started bipartisan, and it looks like it will end bipartisan.”
The ethics bill that passed last night would bar gifts and free travel from lobbyists, require lawmakers to pay more for travel on corporate jets and increase the publicizing of earmarks. It also restricts lobbying by the spouses of sitting members, increases the time before a former lawmaker can become a lobbyist, requires more disclosure by lobbyists, and denies pensions to lawmakers convicted in the future of serious crimes.
The Republican measure will be voted on Monday as an amendment to the bill to raise the minimum wage. This power to revise spending bills would differ from a line-item veto in that either chamber of Congress could reject it with a simple majority vote. Congress had passed a straight line-item veto in 1996, but the Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional in 1998.
Mr. Reid said the episode did not produce winners or losers in the Senate.
“The winners are the American people,” he said in announcing the deal, which came an hour before the vote. “They have reason to have faith in their government again.”
But Mr. Coburn said he voted against the bill because it failed to bring transparency to Congress and said many of the better provisions will be shed before it becomes law. He said as an example of the bill’s shortcomings the large number of restrictions on lobbyists.
“Lobbyists aren’t the problem,” the Oklahoma Republican said. “Members of Congress are the problem. … We need transparency.”
Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, said he appreciated that Democrats “put politics aside to reach an agreement” on Mr. Gregg’s proposal.
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq