The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story

House to echo criticism of troop surge

By

Originally published 12:15 a.m., January 19, 2007, updated 12:00 a.m., January 19, 2007

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Speaker Nancy Pelosi said yesterday that House Democrats will support a Senate resolution denouncing President Bush's proposal to increase the number of troops in Iraq.

"It is not in the national interest of the United States to deepen its military involvement in Iraq, particularly by escalating the U.S. troop presence in Iraq," she said at a press conference yesterday, reading with approval from the nonbinding Senate resolution.

"Introduced in a bipartisan way in the United States Senate, that resolution will be supported in the House by the Democrats," Mrs. Pelosi said. "We do not support the escalation of the war. We do not think it is in our national interest. We will engage the public in that debate."

Mrs. Pelosi has made clear her disdain for the "surge" proposal since before Mr. Bush's prime-time address to the nation last week, but yesterday's remarks were her first indication of the language that she will want the House to approve. The Senate bill was introduced Wednesday.

While the nonbinding resolution will have no concrete impact on the deployment of troops in the Middle East, it is likely to be a startling declaration to Mr. Bush, U.S. forces and the rest of the world that the commander in chief is operating without the support of either chamber of Congress.

Sen. Olympia J. Snowe of Maine, one of the Senate resolution's two Republican co-sponsors, said yesterday that even the symbolic power of a nonbinding resolution "should not be underestimated."

Passing both chambers "would speak loud and clear to the American people and to the president. A president can't sustain a military conflict without the support either of Congress as well as the American people, and that's what the president is up against," she told MSNBC.

During the past week, congressional opposition to Mr. Bush's war policy has made headlines around the world.

"Senators oppose Bush's Iraq plan" said Al Jazeera's Web site yesterday. The story quoted Sen. Chuck Hagel, Nebraska Republican and a co-author of the Senate resolution, saying: "I will do everything I can to stop the president's policy as he outlined it on Wednesday night. I think it is dangerously irresponsible."

Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr., Delaware Democrat and chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said his panel will start debate on the resolution on Wednesday. It was not clear last night when there would be a floor vote in either chamber.

During yesterday's press conference, Mrs. Pelosi said she expects the legislation to garner bipartisan support in the House.

Some liberal Democrats want more. Earlier this week, Rep. Lynn Woolsey, California Democrat, introduced a bill that would require all U.S. troops to leave Iraq within six months and cut off funding if they do not. The bill has 17 co-sponsors, although none are party leaders.

Relegated to the sidelines in Congress after the November elections largely because of their support of the war, Republicans held a week of "listening sessions" to search for a war platform they could unite on.

"We have learned from our discussions that while differences of opinion do exist in the Conference, commonality also exists. What unites us is far stronger than what divides us," Republican Conference Chairman Adam H. Putnam of Florida wrote in a letter yesterday to colleagues. "As Democrats continue to debate over which course of cut-and-run they should support, House Republicans are categorically united behind four guiding principles."

Included in their list of principles is that "there is only one commander in chief," "failure in Iraq is not an option," and "we are opposed to cutting off funding for our troops."

And, after years of complaints from Democrats over lackadaisical oversight of the war, Republicans yesterday declared, "Congress has a constitutional right and obligation to exercise oversight."

• This article is based in part on wire service reports.

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments
Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Powell airs doubts on Obama agenda
  2. BREITBART: New York Times Barbie strikes again
  3. Croatia's leader resigns
  4. Palin fires back at critics on Twitter

Most Shared

  1. BREITBART: New York Times Barbie strikes again
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. Obama isn't cool -- the globe is
  4. Croatia's leader resigns
  5. Biden: White House 'misread' economy
  6. A chill in air for Obama in Russia
  7. China says 156 killed, 828 hurt in riots
  8. Palin fires back at critics on Twitter
  9. GM, Chrysler's sales suffer after bailouts
  10. Iran releases Washington Times reporter

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Related Stories

Karzai asks NATO to explain civilian deaths

Top Pentagon commander in Afghanistan

No easy answers

Post-election showdown

Mr. Obama goes to Moscow

Specter faces hurdles in Democratic re-election

EDITORIAL: Green light to bomb Iran

What's at stake

Democrats seek GOP votes for ambitious agenda

Groups attack moderates on public option

Poll

Do you think Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's abrupt resignation was a good move politically speaking?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.