- Outrage as Air Force base in South Carolina boots Nativity scene
- Israel poised for a $173M boost from the U.S. for missile defense
- Leon Panetta named as source of ‘Zero Dark Thirty’ scriptwriter’s information
- Mandela service sign language interpreter: ‘He made up his own signs’
- Pope Francis named Time’s ‘Person of the Year’
- Ben Affleck: Fundraising for Democrats started to ‘feel gross’
- Vladimir Putin orders military to boost presence in Arctic
- Brooklyn, N.Y.: ‘Lesbian capital’ of the Northeast
- Elian Gonzalez: It’s America’s fault that my mother died
- India top court rules homosexuality is illegal
A stillness in the Senate
With a feeling of sadness, one wonders what happened to the stately, United States Senate that built a reputation for solving major national problems such as civil rights. The year is half over, and what has the Senate done?
Where are great Senate leaders like Lyndon Johnson and Everett Dirksen when we need them? The current Senate leaders, Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell, just don’t measure up. This is a critical time for the nation, but the Congress seems to simply debate the issues and then back away, leaving the problems unresolved.
Social Security and Medicare reforms were widely debated in Congress but nothing happened. Now with the senators rushing off to vacation, we find the same situation with immigration. The complex bipartisan immigration bill was defeated and then left hanging, although several parts of the bill appeared to have majority support if considered separately.
The dominant public opinion is that there will be no action on immigration until after the 2008 presidential elections. And who knows when constructive changes in Social Security and Medicare will take place?
The word “amnesty” has developed strong emotions, and thus the fate of 12 million illegals will remain undetermined. During the Senate debate, no one came up with an acceptable approach on what to do with this growing percentage of our population. The major problem is clear, but not the answers.
The Senate debate did bring forth some issues where it appeared some solutions could be reached. The question is who will have the courage to propose these issues as bills separate from those arguments which drew negative emotions?
“I voted ‘no’ because this immigration bill is not ready and has not earned the confidence of the American people,” Mr. Alexander said. “With this bill, Congress has been trying to bite off more than it can chew on a problem that has been 20 years in the making. To regain the public’s confidence, we ought to scale it back and fix the problem step-by-step by absolutely securing our borders first, then enforcing our laws without amnesty.
“I hope there eventually will be a piece of legislation I can support that will make it possible to secure the border, help prospective citizens learn English and do a better job of welcoming highly skilled foreign workers and researchers who create jobs in the United States. We have more work to do to achieve these goals. I hope Washington has learned some important lessons from this process. The people expect us to deal with major issues but with a full and open debate.”
The only problem with his statement is that Mr. Alexander did not volunteer to help restart the actions he prescribed.
During the debate on the immigration bill both sides agreed most strongly on the need to take stronger steps to cut off the flow of immigrants across the border. President Bush offered to approve $4 billion more toward that effort, but, as things stand, Congress has not taken advantage of that offer.
The question of the effectiveness of a border fence is debatable, but clearly the American public has doubts about our ability to control the border, and if a fence will change that, it would be worthwhile. Perhaps more important would be vast increases in border patrol forces and wider use of technical devices such as drone airplanes and radar.
The immigration debate brought forth the fact that a surprisingly large number of members of Congress and U.S. citizens doubt the sincerity and effectiveness of current government efforts to control the border. That is a bad situation in need of immediate remedy.
There are other areas where there is need for immediate action. Sen. Arlen Specter, Pennsylvania Republican, described the Senate action as a “bump in the road.” One of the bumps that could be resolved separately is to approve a temporary farm workers plan, such as that pursued by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat. Our farmers need help, and unless they get it, many crops will be left hanging on the vine as food prices escalate.
By Donald Lambro
Growth spikes are little more than trend-free anomalies
- Teen thugs in DC run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
- New budget accord saves $23 billion -- after $65 billion spending spree
- More than a quarter million sign up for Obamacare in November
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- FITTON: A closer look at the Benghazi lie
- Obama's antics at Nelson Mandela tribute: Jovial conversation, handshake with Raul Castro
- Gov't Motors: Obama fudges math on auto bailout, $10.5 billion loss for taxpayers
- Somber duty: U.S. presidents in hot demand at Mandela's memorial
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Human interest stories to feed interest, satisfy curiosity and see outside the box.
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
News and views on the Civil War.
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up by Lisa King Dolloff and friends.
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow