- Obama’s regulatory agenda will cost U.S. economy $143B next year: report
- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
- John Boehner says GOP should support gay candidates: ‘I do’
- Grass-Whopper: Pan-fried cricket burgers go over big in New York City
Hadley: Iraq progress by fall
Question of the Day
National Security Adviser Stephen J. Hadley yesterday said he expects the situation on the ground in Iraq to improve by September and, therefore, rejected a proposal from two Republican senators that calls for starting to draft redeployment plans for American forces before then.
Mr. Hadley was asked on CBS‘ “Face the Nation” by host Bob Schieffer whether “the situation in Iraq is going to look any different” when Gen. David M. Petraeus delivers his progress report on the surge to Congress in September.
“I think it will,” Mr. Hadley replied. “I think we will have had two additional months of our security strategy going forward; now, since the last several weeks, with a full complement of forces.
“We think we will see progress on the security side. We hope we will see the bottom-up kind of reconciliation” among Iraqis, he said. “But the point is that Congress set a schedule, which basically said we need to do a review in September.”
The White House and some Republican lawmakers are asking for patience on Iraq until September, arguing that a surge of American forces into Baghdad and other areas has only been fully implemented for a few weeks.
However, a proposal by two Republicans — Sen. Richard G. Lugar of Indiana, ranking member on the Foreign Relations Committee, and Sen. John W. Warner of Virginia, ranking member on the Armed Services Committee — would require the administration to deliver a plan by October outlining how American forces could be moved away from a combat role in Iraq.
“They’ve done a useful service in indicating the kinds of things that we should be thinking about,” he said. “But the time to begin that process is September. The opening shot really ought to be to heard from the commanders on the ground who can make an assessment of where we are in our current strategy.”
Mr. Warner said his plan was different from various Democratic proposals because it does not call for a complete withdrawal of American forces from Iraq — a feature that has left Democrats cool to the proposal.
“This nation of ours has got to remain in that area,” Mr. Warner said during an appearance on ABC’s “This Week.” He said that America would have to remain involved in the Middle East because of oil, its relationship with Israel and other “vital security interests.”
“I’m confident when the reports come to the president in September, he will come forward, we ask for it in October, with his revision in strategy to comport with the situation on the ground,” he said. “The president will have to make some changes, and I’m confident the president will do so.”
During his CBS interview, Mr. Hadley was pressed by Mr. Schieffer on how much political progress Iraq’s lawmakers could deliver before the September report when they are planning to vacation for the entire month of August.
Mr. Hadley said he is trying to convince them to stay through August and noted he and others had already successfully lobbied Iraqi leaders to work through July, which they had originally scheduled for vacation as well.
House Democrats passed a bill last week that requires a withdrawal of American forces from Iraq by next April. However, that bill only attracted the support of four Republicans, falling far short of a veto-proof majority. Similarly, the Senate failed to garner the necessary 60 votes for a proposal by Sen. James H. Webb Jr., Virginia Democrat, that would give soldiers matching time off for time served in combat.
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Hack attack: 2 million Facebook, Twitter passwords stolen
- Kill team: Obama war chiefs widen drone death zones
- Obama administration issues permits for wind farms to kill more eagles
- Embryonic stem cell research falls out of favor as scientists go ethical
- EDITORIAL: Our ideological president
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- MILLER: Obamacare enrollees include 101 members of the House of Representatives
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
The Constitution: Every issue, every time. No exceptions, no excuses. And how to get from here to there.
Why can’t humans just be free to be humans?
Get in the middle of all the action inside and outside the boxing ring.
Find the latest news and happening that effect those in the Washington D.C., Northern Virginia and Maryland Metro region.
White House pets gone wild!