Focus evaporates in 'Goya's Ghosts'

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

Milos Forman directed one of the great films about the mystery of artistic creativity, 1984's "Amadeus."

But don't go into "Goya's Ghosts" expecting another biographical tour de force. Don't go expecting to learn much about the titular artist at all.

In fact, it's not clear what "Goya's Ghosts" is about.

The film starts out promisingly. In 1792 Madrid, high-ranking priests examine prints made by painter Francisco Goya (Stellan Skarsgard). The court painter was in favor with the crown, but his new work had none of the dignified grandeur of his portraiture: Its disturbing imagery critiqued Spanish society. (Never mind that he didn't actually start on the Caprichos prints until years later.)

The priests ask Brother Lorenzo (Javier Bardem) why the rebel is painting his portrait. Lorenzo defends the artist and his connection with the poor and downtrodden. He suggests that a better way to stamp out heresy is to push harder with the Inquisition: They've only burned eight heretics in 50 years.

One of the new victims is a Goya model (Natalie Portman). Ines is suspected of secretly practicing Judaism after declining pork at a tavern. Her father, a rich patron of Goya and the church, begs for the artist's help. He at first refuses, but reluctantly sets up a meeting with Lorenzo.

The result is a strangely genteel dinner party. "Was she put to the question?" Ines' mother asks politely. Lorenzo nods. The admission through euphemism that her daughter was tortured has little effect on her.

The father is bewildered that Lorenzo believes a confession extracted through torture can be anything but false. So he puts Lorenzo to the question — and has him sign a letter stating he's a monkey.

The gambit doesn't get Ines out of jail, but it does lose Lorenzo his job — although not before he makes one last visit to the beautiful model, whom he can't resist raping.

It's an interesting setup. Goya was a fascinating figure, an official court painter who became something of a social reformer — and practically founded modern art in the process. His dilemma about his model might be a clever fictional way into the story of his development as both a man and an artist.